Literature DB >> 15916114

Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Birgitta Larsby1, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell, Stig Arlinger.   

Abstract

Cognitive tests of speech understanding were administered (presented as text, or in auditory or audiovisual modality) and perceived effort was rated. This was done in four background conditions: in silence, and in three types of noise (S/N=+10 dB) varying in temporal structure and meaningfulness. Four groups of 12 subjects each (young/elderly with normal hearing and young/elderly with hearing impairment) participated. The presence of noise had a negative effect on accuracy and speed of performance in the speech processing tasks, and resulted in higher scores of perceived effort, even when the stimuli were presented as text. Differences in performance between noise conditions existed. In the subjective scores, the noise with temporal variations, but without meaningful content, was the most disruptive of the three noise conditions. In the objective scores the hearing-impaired subjects showed poorer results in noise with temporal variations. The elderly subjects were more distracted by noise with temporal variations, and especially by noise with meaningful content. In noise, all subjects, particularly those with impaired hearing, were more dependent upon visual cues than in the quiet condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15916114     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500057244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  37 in total

1.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of listening effort: neurodynamical modeling and measurement.

Authors:  Daniel J Strauss; Farah I Corona-Strauss; Carlos Trenado; Corinna Bernarding; Wolfgang Reith; Matthias Latzel; Matthias Froehlich
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  A Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Listening Effort As Part of an Audiologic Test Battery.

Authors:  Jani Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn Cox; Paul Pendergraft
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Effects of Looking Behavior on Listening and Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Shannon Wannagot
Journal:  J Educ Audiol       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 8.  The role of temporal structure in the investigation of sensory memory, auditory scene analysis, and speech perception: a healthy-aging perspective.

Authors:  Johanna Maria Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; David Poeppel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Understanding Speech Amid the Jingle and Jangle: Recommendations for Improving Measurement Practices in Listening Effort Research.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Lucia Ray; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; Jed Villanueva; Violet A Brown
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2021-03-23

10.  Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.