Literature DB >> 26476369

A metric and workflow for quality control in the analysis of heterogeneity in phenotypic profiles and screens.

Albert Gough1, Tong Ying Shun2, D Lansing Taylor3, Mark Schurdak3.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity is well recognized as a common property of cellular systems that impacts biomedical research and the development of therapeutics and diagnostics. Several studies have shown that analysis of heterogeneity: gives insight into mechanisms of action of perturbagens; can be used to predict optimal combination therapies; and can be applied to tumors where heterogeneity is believed to be associated with adaptation and resistance. Cytometry methods including high content screening (HCS), high throughput microscopy, flow cytometry, mass spec imaging and digital pathology capture cell level data for populations of cells. However it is often assumed that the population response is normally distributed and therefore that the average adequately describes the results. A deeper understanding of the results of the measurements and more effective comparison of perturbagen effects requires analysis that takes into account the distribution of the measurements, i.e. the heterogeneity. However, the reproducibility of heterogeneous data collected on different days, and in different plates/slides has not previously been evaluated. Here we show that conventional assay quality metrics alone are not adequate for quality control of the heterogeneity in the data. To address this need, we demonstrate the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic as a metric for monitoring the reproducibility of heterogeneity in an SAR screen, describe a workflow for quality control in heterogeneity analysis. One major challenge in high throughput biology is the evaluation and interpretation of heterogeneity in thousands of samples, such as compounds in a cell-based screen. In this study we also demonstrate that three heterogeneity indices previously reported, capture the shapes of the distributions and provide a means to filter and browse big data sets of cellular distributions in order to compare and identify distributions of interest. These metrics and methods are presented as a workflow for analysis of heterogeneity in large scale biology projects.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug discovery; Heterogeneity; High content screening; Phenotypic profiling; Systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476369      PMCID: PMC5200891          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  55 in total

1.  Advances in high content screening for drug discovery.

Authors:  Kenneth A Giuliano; Jeffrey R Haskins; D Lansing Taylor
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability.

Authors:  Berend Snijder; Lucas Pelkmans
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Tumor heterogeneity confounds and illuminates: a case for Darwinian tumor evolution.

Authors:  Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Tumor heterogeneity confounds and illuminates: assessing the implications.

Authors:  Maria Kleppe; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Vanessa Almendro; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hannah H Chang; Martin Hemberg; Mauricio Barahona; Donald E Ingber; Sui Huang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Circumventing cancer drug resistance in the era of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Levi A Garraway; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Pipeline for illumination correction of images for high-throughput microscopy.

Authors:  S Singh; M-A Bray; T R Jones; A E Carpenter
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Heterogeneity in the physiological states and pharmacological responses of differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.

Authors:  Lit-Hsin Loo; Hai-Jui Lin; Dinesh K Singh; Kathleen M Lyons; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Phylogenetic quantification of intra-tumour heterogeneity.

Authors:  Roland F Schwarz; Anne Trinh; Botond Sipos; James D Brenton; Nick Goldman; Florian Markowetz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploiting Analysis of Heterogeneity to Increase the Information Content Extracted from Fluorescence Micrographs of Transgenic Zebrafish Embryos.

Authors:  Tongying Shun; Albert H Gough; Subramaniam Sanker; Neil A Hukriede; Andreas Vogt
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  Biologically Relevant Heterogeneity: Metrics and Practical Insights.

Authors:  Albert Gough; Andrew M Stern; John Maier; Timothy Lezon; Tong-Ying Shun; Chakra Chennubhotla; Mark E Schurdak; Steven A Haney; D Lansing Taylor
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.341

3.  Single-Cell Distribution Analysis of AR Levels by High-Throughput Microscopy in Cell Models: Application for Testing Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Ragini M Mistry; Pankaj K Singh; Hannah L Johnson; Maureen G Mancini; Adam T Szafran; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.341

4.  Connecting Neuronal Cell Protective Pathways and Drug Combinations in a Huntington's Disease Model through the Application of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.

Authors:  Fen Pei; Hongchun Li; Mark J Henderson; Steven A Titus; Ajit Jadhav; Anton Simeonov; Murat Can Cobanoglu; Seyed H Mousavi; Tongying Shun; Lee McDermott; Prema Iyer; Michael Fioravanti; Diane Carlisle; Robert M Friedlander; Ivet Bahar; D Lansing Taylor; Timothy R Lezon; Andrew M Stern; Mark E Schurdak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Quality Control for Single Cell Imaging Analytics Using Endocrine Disruptor-Induced Changes in Estrogen Receptor Expression.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Pankaj K Singh; Ragini M Mistry; Hannah L Johnson; Radhika D Dandekar; Maureen G Mancini; Adam T Szafran; Arvind U Rao; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.