| Literature DB >> 28686535 |
Philippe Moreau1, Michel Attal1, Denis Caillot1, Margaret Macro1, Lionel Karlin1, Laurent Garderet1, Thierry Facon1, Lotfi Benboubker1, Martine Escoffre-Barbe1, Anne-Marie Stoppa1, Kamel Laribi1, Cyrille Hulin1, Aurore Perrot1, Gerald Marit1, Jean-Richard Eveillard1, Florence Caillon1, Caroline Bodet-Milin1, Brigitte Pegourie1, Veronique Dorvaux1, Carine Chaleteix1, Kenneth Anderson1, Paul Richardson1, Nikhil C Munshi1, Herve Avet-Loiseau1, Aurelie Gaultier1, Jean-Michel Nguyen1, Benoit Dupas1, Eric Frampas1, Françoise Kraeber-Bodere1.
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) are important imaging techniques in multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a prospective trial in patients with MM aimed at comparing MRI and PET-CT with respect to the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis and the prognostic value of the techniques. Patients and Methods One hundred thirty-four patients received a combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. PET-CT and MRI were performed at diagnosis, after three cycles of RVD, and before maintenance therapy. The primary end point was the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis by MRI versus PET-CT. Secondary end points included the prognostic impact of MRI and PET-CT regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results At diagnosis, MRI results were positive in 127 of 134 patients (95%), and PET-CT results were positive in 122 of 134 patients (91%; P = .33). Normalization of MRI after three cycles of RVD and before maintenance was not predictive of PFS or OS. PET-CT became normal after three cycles of RVD in 32% of the patients with a positive evaluation at baseline, and PFS was improved in this group (30-month PFS, 78.7% v 56.8%, respectively). PET-CT normalization before maintenance was described in 62% of the patients who were positive at baseline. This was associated with better PFS and OS. Extramedullary disease at diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS, whereas PET-CT normalization before maintenance was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusion There is no difference in the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis when comparing PET-CT and MRI. PET-CT is a powerful tool to evaluate the prognosis of de novo myeloma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28686535 PMCID: PMC5578392 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544