Literature DB >> 28686535

Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography at Diagnosis and Before Maintenance Therapy in Symptomatic Patients With Multiple Myeloma Included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Results of the IMAJEM Study.

Philippe Moreau1, Michel Attal1, Denis Caillot1, Margaret Macro1, Lionel Karlin1, Laurent Garderet1, Thierry Facon1, Lotfi Benboubker1, Martine Escoffre-Barbe1, Anne-Marie Stoppa1, Kamel Laribi1, Cyrille Hulin1, Aurore Perrot1, Gerald Marit1, Jean-Richard Eveillard1, Florence Caillon1, Caroline Bodet-Milin1, Brigitte Pegourie1, Veronique Dorvaux1, Carine Chaleteix1, Kenneth Anderson1, Paul Richardson1, Nikhil C Munshi1, Herve Avet-Loiseau1, Aurelie Gaultier1, Jean-Michel Nguyen1, Benoit Dupas1, Eric Frampas1, Françoise Kraeber-Bodere1.   

Abstract

Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) are important imaging techniques in multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a prospective trial in patients with MM aimed at comparing MRI and PET-CT with respect to the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis and the prognostic value of the techniques. Patients and Methods One hundred thirty-four patients received a combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. PET-CT and MRI were performed at diagnosis, after three cycles of RVD, and before maintenance therapy. The primary end point was the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis by MRI versus PET-CT. Secondary end points included the prognostic impact of MRI and PET-CT regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results At diagnosis, MRI results were positive in 127 of 134 patients (95%), and PET-CT results were positive in 122 of 134 patients (91%; P = .33). Normalization of MRI after three cycles of RVD and before maintenance was not predictive of PFS or OS. PET-CT became normal after three cycles of RVD in 32% of the patients with a positive evaluation at baseline, and PFS was improved in this group (30-month PFS, 78.7% v 56.8%, respectively). PET-CT normalization before maintenance was described in 62% of the patients who were positive at baseline. This was associated with better PFS and OS. Extramedullary disease at diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS, whereas PET-CT normalization before maintenance was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusion There is no difference in the detection of bone lesions at diagnosis when comparing PET-CT and MRI. PET-CT is a powerful tool to evaluate the prognosis of de novo myeloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28686535      PMCID: PMC5578392          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

1.  Front-line transplantation program with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination as induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Murielle Roussel; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Nelly Robillard; Cyrille Hulin; Xavier Leleu; Lotfi Benboubker; Gérald Marit; Philippe Moreau; Brigitte Pegourie; Denis Caillot; Christophe Fruchart; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Catherine Gentil; Soraya Wuilleme; Anne Huynh; Benjamin Hebraud; Jill Corre; Marie-Lorraine Chretien; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The Role of Imaging in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Myeloma in 2016.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Lia A Moulopoulos
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

3.  Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe).

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni; Annibale Versari; Stephane Chauvie; Andrea Bianchi; Marco Rensi; Marilena Bellò; Ilaria Rambaldi; Andrea Gallamini; Francesca Patriarca; Francesca Gay; Barbara Gamberi; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  European Myeloma Network guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma-related complications.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Martina Kleber; Monika Engelhardt; Sonja Zweegman; Francesca Gay; Efstathios Kastritis; Niels W C J van de Donk; Benedetto Bruno; Orhan Sezer; Annemiek Broijl; Sara Bringhen; Meral Beksac; Alessandra Larocca; Roman Hajek; Pellegrino Musto; Hans Erik Johnsen; Fortunato Morabito; Heinz Ludwig; Michele Cavo; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma.

Authors:  Michel Attal; Valerie Lauwers-Cances; Cyrille Hulin; Xavier Leleu; Denis Caillot; Martine Escoffre; Bertrand Arnulf; Margaret Macro; Karim Belhadj; Laurent Garderet; Murielle Roussel; Catherine Payen; Claire Mathiot; Jean P Fermand; Nathalie Meuleman; Sandrine Rollet; Michelle E Maglio; Andrea A Zeytoonjian; Edie A Weller; Nikhil Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI for the detection of persistent or relapsing disease in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Hannah B Hentschel; Thorsten A Bley; András Treszl; Christine Eulenburg; Thorsten Derlin; Jin Yamamura; Gerhard Adam; Thomas Stübig; Nicolaus Kröger; Christoph Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Alan Mitchell; Sarah Waheed; John Crowley; Antje Hoering; Nathan Petty; Tracy Brown; Twyla Bartel; Elias Anaissie; Frits van Rhee; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Bruno Paiva; Kenneth C Anderson; Brian Durie; Ola Landgren; Philippe Moreau; Nikhil Munshi; Sagar Lonial; Joan Bladé; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Meletios Dimopoulos; Efstathios Kastritis; Mario Boccadoro; Robert Orlowski; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Andrew Spencer; Jian Hou; Wee Joo Chng; Saad Z Usmani; Elena Zamagni; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Sundar Jagannath; Hans E Johnsen; Evangelos Terpos; Anthony Reiman; Robert A Kyle; Pieter Sonneveld; Paul G Richardson; Philip McCarthy; Heinz Ludwig; Wenming Chen; Michele Cavo; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Suzanne Lentzsch; Jens Hillengass; Antonio Palumbo; Alberto Orfao; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus San Miguel; Herve Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  78 in total

1.  Value of low-dose whole-body CT in the management of patients with multiple myeloma and precursor states.

Authors:  F Joseph Simeone; Joel P Harvey; Andrew J Yee; Elizabeth K O'Donnell; Noopur S Raje; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Integration of Novel Agents into the Care of Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Robert Z Orlowski; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: critical insights and future directions.

Authors:  Clément Bailly; Thomas Carlier; Bastien Jamet; Cyrille Touzeau; Philippe Moreau; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Caroline Bodet-Milin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Eric Seifter
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 5.  Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Shalin Kothari; Jens Hillengass; Philip L McCarthy; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

Authors:  A Paschali; E Panagiotidis; T Triantafyllou; V Palaska; K Tsirou; E Verrou; E Υiannaki; D Markala; A Papanikolaou; A Pouli; P Konstantinidou; V Chatzipavlidou; E Terpos; E Katodritou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Dimitar Boyadzhiev; Laurence Collette; Maude Berckmans; Nicolas Michoux; Perrine Triqueneaux; Vassiliki Pasoglou; François Jamar; Marie-Christiane Vekemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI before and early after treatment of multiple myeloma: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha; Maged Abdel Gelil Hamed; Rania Refaat; Mohamad Zakarya AlAzzazy; Manar A Bessar; Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed; Ayman F Ahmed; Heba Fathy Tantawy; Khaled Mohamed Altaher; Ahmed Ali Obaya; Amira Hamed Mohamed Afifi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.