Literature DB >> 26471471

Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

J Straatman1, P J M Joosten2, C B Terwee3, M A Cuesta2, E P Jansma4, D L van der Peet2.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is currently the eighth most common cancer worldwide. Improvements in operative techniques and neoadjuvant therapies have led to improved outcomes. Resection of the esophagus carries a high risk of severe complications and has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to assess which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to measure QOL after esophagectomy for cancer. A comprehensive search of original articles was conducted investigating QOL after surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Two authors independently selected relevant articles, conducted clinical appraisal, and extracted data (PJ and JS). Out of 5893 articles, 58 studies were included, consisting of 41 prospective and 17 retrospective cohort studies, including a total of 6964 patients. These studies included 11 different PROMs. The existing PROMs could be divided into generic, symptom-specific, and disease-specific questionnaires. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ C-30) along with the EORTC QLQ-OESophagus module OES18 was the most widely used; in 42 and 32 studies, respectively. The EORTC and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaires use an oncological module and an organ-specific module. One validation study was available, which compared the FACT and EORTC, showing moderate to poor correlation between the questionnaires. A great variety of PROMs are being used in the measurement of QOL after surgery for esophageal cancer. A questionnaire with a general module along with a disease-specific module for assessment of QOL of different treatment modalities seem to be the most desirable, such as the EORTC and the FACT with their specific modules (EORTC QLQ-OES18 and FACT-E). Both are developed in different treatment modalities, such as in surgical patients. With regard to reproducibility of current results, the EORTC is recommended.
© 2015 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROM; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26471471     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  18 in total

1.  Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Harry C Alexander; Cindy H Nguyen; Matthew R Moore; Adam S Bartlett; Jacqueline A Hannam; Garth H Poole; Alan F Merry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores.

Authors:  Joseph D Phillips; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Peng Ye; Jin-Lin Cao; Qiu-Yuan Li; Zhi-Tian Wang; Yun-Hai Yang; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  ERAS and patient reported outcomes in thoracic surgery: a review of current data.

Authors:  Rachel L Medbery; Felix G Fernandez; Onkar V Khullar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Melanie Subramanian; Benjamin D Kozower; Lisa M Brown; Onkar V Khullar; Felix G Fernandez
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  The clinical significance of the intraoperative pathological examination of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes using frozen sections in cervical field lymph node dissection of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinxin Xu; Bin Zheng; Shuliang Zhang; Taidui Zeng; Hao Chen; Wei Zheng; Chun Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Fully covered stents are similar to semi-covered stents with regard to migration in palliative treatment of malignant strictures of the esophagus and gastric cardia: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Persson; Ulrika Smedh; Åse Johnsson; Bo Ohlin; Magnus Sundbom; Magnus Nilsson; Lars Lundell; Berit Sund; Erik Johnsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Prognostic significance and function of the vacuolar H+-ATPase subunit V1E1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung Wook Son; Seok-Hyung Kim; Eun-Yi Moon; Dong-Hoon Kim; Suhkneung Pyo; Sung Hee Um
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 9.  Expression signatures and roles of MicroRNAs in human oesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Xiangyi Kong; Shun Gong; Lijuan Su; Chen Li; Yanguo Kong
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Lymphadenectomy and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: a nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Schandl; Asif Johar; Jesper Lagergren; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.