Literature DB >> 27499954

Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Peng Ye1, Jin-Lin Cao1, Qiu-Yuan Li1, Zhi-Tian Wang1, Yun-Hai Yang1, Wang Lv1, Jian Hu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The greater omentum has been found to be immunologically competent in protecting abdominal organs from inflammation. Anastomotic omentoplasty has been used and proven effective in preventing anastomotic leaks after an esophagectomy. However, pulmonary complications are still a substantial problem after an esophagectomy. This study investigated the benefits of mediastinal transposition of the omentum, a modification of the conventional omental wrapping technique, in controlling overall postoperative intrathoracic complications.
METHODS: From January 2010 to March 2015, 208 consecutive patients receiving an open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred twenty-one patients with omentum mediastinal transposition were assigned to the transposition group and 87 patients without omental transposition were placed in the non-transposition group. The patients' demographics, postoperative short-term outcomes, and in-hospital cost were documented and analyzed.
RESULTS: Mediastinal transposition of the omentum led to a shorter postoperative hospital stay (14 vs. 16 d, P=0.038) and a lower intrathoracic infection rate (30.6% vs. 48.3%, P=0.009). Intrathoracic infection was milder in the transposition group (P=0.005), though a non-significant was found in overall complications (P=0.071). The multivariate logistic regression analyses identified omentum mediastinal transposition (P=0.007, OR=0.415) as an independent protective factor for postoperative intrathoracic infection. The total in-hospital cost was comparable in both groups (P>0.05), whereas the pharmacy cost was lower in the transposition group than in the non-transposition group (¥21,668 vs. ¥27,012, P=0.010).
CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal transposition of the omentum decreases the rate and severity of postoperative intrathoracic infection following an open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. This result in decreased pharmacy costs, rather than resulting in an increased economic burden sustained by surgical patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Omentum; cost; esophageal cancer; infection control; postoperative complications

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499954      PMCID: PMC4958876          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  18 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Tocchi; G Mazzoni; L Lepre; G Costa; G Liotta; N Agostini; M Miccini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors.

Authors:  P K Patil; S G Patel; R C Mistry; R K Deshpande; P B Desai
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Omentoplasty in preventing anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Qing-Feng Zheng; Jian-Jun Wang; Min-Gang Ying; Shou-Yan Liu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Straatman; P J M Joosten; C B Terwee; M A Cuesta; E P Jansma; D L van der Peet
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Stephen G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Arlene Correa; Reza J Mehran; David Rice; Jack Roth; Ara Vaporciyan; Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ji Gang Dai; Zai Yong Zhang; Jia Xin Min; Xiao Bing Huang; Jing Si Wang
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma?

Authors:  Yang Hu; Chunyan Hu; Helin Zhang; Yumin Ping; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of omental interposition to reduce pancreatic fistula and related complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yang Li; Yun Liang; Yao Deng; Zhi-Wei Cai; Ming-Jian Ma; Long-Xiang Wang; Meng Liu; Hong-Wei Wang; Chong-Yi Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.