Literature DB >> 31463699

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores.

Joseph D Phillips1, Sandra L Wong2.   

Abstract

Traditional measures of quality and effectiveness in surgical oncology have focused on morbidity, mortality, and when available, recurrence rates. Measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has become more widely accepted during the last decade. This article reviews instruments commonly used in the surgical treatment of cancer patients to evaluate PROs. In addition, it discusses the linkage of PROs and health-related quality of life measures with traditional surgical complications and highlights future directions related to the expanding use of PROs in the surgical care of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31463699      PMCID： PMC6925633          DOI： 10.1245/s10434-019-07752-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN： 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  90 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patient characteristics and surgery-related factors associated with patient-reported recovery at 1 and 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  J Jakobsson; E Idvall; C Kumlien
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Impact of relaxation training according to Yoga In Daily Life® system on perceived stress after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tine Kovačič; Miha Kovačič
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Development and validation of a colorectal functional outcome questionnaire.

Authors:  Roel Bakx; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Frans J Oort; Willem F van Tets; Willem A Bemelman; J Frederik M Slors; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An Analysis of the Decisions Made for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick J Buchanan; Mariam Abdulghani; Jennifer F Waljee; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Michael S Sabel; Lisa A Newman; Kevin C Chung; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Preoperative quality of life and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients: a new predictor of operative risk?

Authors:  K M Doll; A C Snavely; A Kalinowski; D E Irwin; J T Bensen; V Bae-Jump; J F Boggess; J T Soper; W R Brewster; P A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life predict survival in potentially curable patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mark van Heijl; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Angela G E M de Boer; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Hans B Reitsma; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Jan J B van Lanschot; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 5.344
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prioritizing the Patient Perspective in Oncologic Surgery.

Authors:  Nikhil Panda; Alex B Haynes
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Profiling patient-reported symptom recovery from oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world longitudinal study.

Authors:  Xi Luo; Qin Xie; Qiuling Shi; Yan Miao; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Hong Yin; Xuefeng Leng; Yongtao Han; Hong Zhou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Using Patient-Reported Outcomes to Optimize Care of the Surgical Oncology Patient.

Authors:  Joseph D Phillips; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Abdominal Cancer Surgery and Student-Led Surgical Research.

Authors:  Augusto León; Klaus Puschel; Augusto E León; Francisca Honold
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Remote monitoring of patient recovery following lung cancer surgery: a messenger application approach.

Authors:  Xinghua Cheng; Yunhai Yang; Yang Shentu; Zhengping Ding; Qianjun Zhou; Qiang Tan; Qingquan Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures PRO-CTCAE and CAT EORTC QLQ-C30 in Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery (PATRONUS): A Student-Initiated German Medical Audit (SIGMA) Study.

Authors:  André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.