| Literature DB >> 26470013 |
Huilin Hou1,2, Minghui Shang2, Lin Wang2, Wenge Li3, Bin Tang1, Weiyou Yang2.
Abstract
Currently, Degussa P25, with the typical mixed phases of anatase and rutile TiO2, is widely applied as the commercial photocatalysts. However, there are still some of obstacles for the P25 nanoparticles with totally high photocatalytic activities, especially for the catalytic stability due to their inevitable aggregation of the nanoparticles when used as the photocatalysts. In the present work, we reported the exploration of a novel TiO2 photocatalyst, which could offer an ideal platform for synergetic combination of the mixed-phase composition, hollow architecture and mesoporous walls for the desired excellent photocatalytic efficiency and robust stability. The mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers were fabricated via a facile single capillary electrospinning technique, in which the foaming agents were used for creating mesopores throughout the walls of the hollow fibers. The obtained hollow fibers exhibit a high purity and possess the mixed phases of 94.6% anatase and 5.4% rutile TiO2. As compared to P25, the as-fabricated mesoporous TiO2 hollow fibers exhibited much higher efficient photocatalytic activities and stabilities toward the hydrogen evolution with a rate of ~499.1 μmol g(-1)·h(-1) and ~99.5% degradation Rhodamine B (RhB) in 60 min, suggesting their promising application in efficient photocatalysts.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26470013 PMCID: PMC4606570 DOI: 10.1038/srep15228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration for the formation of mesoporous TiO2 hollow fibers via the foaming assisted electrospinning. (b) A typical SEM image of the calcined products under a low magnification. (c–e) Typical SEM images of the calcined products under higher magnifications and different views. (f) A representative XRD pattern of the calcined products.
Figure 2(a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm curve of mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers. (b) Pore size distribution curve of the mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers.
Figure 3(a) A representative TEM image of the mesoporous TiO2 hollow fibers. (b) The corresponding SAED pattern. (c) A representative HRTEM image of the mesoporous hollow fibers recorded from the marked area in (a). (d,e) Fast fourier transformation (FFT) images of the marked areas of A and B in (c). The insets are the partial geometry models of anatase and rutile TiO2, respectively. (f,g) The corresponding inverse fast fourier transformation (IFFT) images of (d,e), respectively. (h,i) The element mappings of Ti and O within a single nanofiber.
Figure 4(a) The hydrogen production photocatalyzed by the as-fabricated mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers as well as p25 under different irradiation times. (b) Reusability experiment for photocatalytic H2 generation of mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers and p25. (c) Photocatalytic degradation of RhB (C0 = 10 mg/L) of mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers and p25 under UV-visible light irradiation. (d) The plot of ln(C0/C) with irradiation time for mesoporous TiO2 hollow nanofibers and p25. (e) The proposed mechanism for the enhanced photocatalytic activities of the mesoporous TiO2 hollow fibers with mixed phases of anatase and rutile.
Comparison of the related typical works for H2 production using TiO2 nanofibers as the Photocatalyst.
| Material | Preparation | Morphology | Irradiation conditions | Reaction solution | Activity (μmol g−1h−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 (B) | hydrothermal | Nanofibers | 15 W UV lamp | Neat ethanol | 238 | |
| TiO2 | Electrospinning | Nanofibers | 450 W Hg | Water+MeOH | 54 | |
| TiO2 (B)/Pt | hyndrothermal | Nanofibers | 15 W UV lamp | Neat ethanol | 257 | |
| TiO2/Pt | Electrospinning | Nanofibers | 300 W Xe | Water+MeOH | 910 | |
| TiO2/Pt | hydrothermal | Nanofibers | 300 W Hg | Water+MeOH | 310 | |
| TiO2 | hydrothermal | Nanofibers | 6 UVB lamps | Water +ethanol | 30 | |
| TiO2 | Electrospinning | Porous Nanofibers | 400 W Hg | Water+MeOH | 80 | |
| TiO2 | Electrospinning | Nanofibers | 400 W Hg | Water+AO7 | 21 | |
| TiO2 | Electrospinning | Porous fibers | 300 W Xe | Water+MeOH | 198 | |
| TiO2 | foaming-assisted electrospinning | Mesoporous nanofibers | 300 W Xe | Water+MeOH | 399 | |
| TiO2 | foaming-assisted electrospinning | Mesoporous nanofibers | 300 W Xe | Water+MeOH | 499 | Current work |