| Literature DB >> 34205177 |
Mikhail F Butman1, Nataliya E Kochkina2, Nikolay L Ovchinnikov1, Karl W Krämer3.
Abstract
Fibrous Ti/Ce oxide photocatalysts were prepared for the first time by a biomimetic solution process using short flax fibers (flax straw processing waste) as a biotemplate. Titanium polyhydroxy complex solutions with 3% and 5% cerium were used as precursors. Flax fibers were impregnated in an autoclave under hydrothermal conditions. Ti/Ce oxides were obtained from the biotemplate by annealing at 600 °C. The photocatalytic activity of the Ti/Ce oxides was studied by the adsorption and decomposition of the dye rhodamine B under UV irradiation. The photocatalytic decomposition of the dye was 50% and 75% faster for Ti/Ce oxides with 3% and 5% Ce, respectively, than for the analogous undoped fibrous TiO2. The morphologies, textures, and structures of the photocatalysts were studied by scanning electron microscopy, low temperature N2 adsorption/desorption, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and X-ray and XPS analytical methods. It was shown that the introduction of Ce into the precursor solution increased the surface irregularity of the Ti/Ce oxide crystallites compared to pure TiO2. This effect scaled with the Ce concentration. Ce improved the UV light absorption of the material. The Ti/Ce oxides contained Ce4+/Ce3+ pairs that played an important role in redox processes and intensified the photocatalytic activity.Entities:
Keywords: Ti/Ce oxides; Ti/Ce polyhydroxy complexes; photocatalytic activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205177 PMCID: PMC8199952 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26113399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Kinetic curves of rhodamine B adsorption by fibrous photocatalysts at 25 °C (a) and photocatalytic degradation of the dye under UV irradiation (b).
Figure 2SEM images of fibrous TiO2–3% Ce (a,b) and TiO2–5% Ce (c,d).
Figure 3Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distribution (b) of the fibrous pure TiO2 and TiO2–xCe samples.
Porosity data for the fibrous TiO2 and TiO2–xCe samples.
| Sample |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | 27.1 ± 1.4 | 0.088 ± 0.001 | 0.086 ± 0.001 | 7.7 ± 0.9 | 2.483 ± 0.006 |
| TiO2–3% Ce | 42.9 ± 2.1 | 0.122 ± 0.001 | 0.128 ± 0.001 | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 2.515 ± 0.008 |
| TiO2–5% Ce | 46.0 ± 2.3 | 0.127 ± 0.001 | 0.133 ± 0.001 | 9.4 ± 1.1 | 2.534 ± 0.009 |
Figure 4Dependence of lnV on ln(−lnP/P0) for the fibrous TiO2 and TiO2–xCe samples.
Figure 5UV–Vis absorption of the fibrous TiO2 and TiO2–xCe samples.
Figure 6XRD patterns of the fibrous TiO2 and TiO2–x% Ce samples.
Average crystallite size and phase composition of the fibrous TiO2 and TiO2–x% Ce samples.
| Sample | Average Crystallite Size, nm | Phase Composition, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | R | A | R | |
| TiO2 | 21.0 ± 1.6 | 26.4 ± 2.0 | 51.3 ± 1.0 | 48.7 ± 0.9 |
| TiO2–3% Ce | 17.5 ± 1.5 | 20.8 ± 1.6 | 47.3 ± 0.9 | 52.7 ± 1.0 |
| TiO2–5% Ce | 17.4 ± 1.5 | 22.8 ± 1.8 | 46.6 ± 0.9 | 53.4 ± 1.1 |
Figure 7XPS survey spectra (a), Ti 2p XPS spectra (b), O 1s spectra (c), and Ce 3d region (d) of the TiO2–5% Ce sample before (1) and after (2) the photocatalysis.