| Literature DB >> 27929084 |
Lakshmi Prasanna V1, Vijayaraghavan Rajagopalan1.
Abstract
EnvironmenEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27929084 PMCID: PMC5144144 DOI: 10.1038/srep38606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) FTIR of ZnO2 (b) FTIR of ZnO2/ppy (c) XRD of ZnO2(d) XRD of ZnO2/ppy (e) UV- DRS (f) Tauc plot of ZnO2 and ZnO2/ppy.
Figure 2HRTEM of (a) and (b) ZnO2 (c) SAED of ZnO2 (d) and (e) ZnO2/ppy (f) SAED of ZnO2/ppy.
Figure 3XPS of ZnO2/ppy (a) Zn 2p (b) O1s (c) C 1 s (d) N 1 s(e) EPR of ppy and (f) EPR of ZnO2/ppy.
Figure 4(a) H2O2 produced form aqueous suspension of ZnO2 and ZnO2/ppy in dark (b) NBT degradation by ZnO2/ppy in dark for 2 h (c) Fluorescence spectra of hydroxyl terepthalic acid from aqueous suspensions of ZnO2/ppy in dark (d) Under visible irradiation (e) Degradation of RhB (10 ppm) in dark by ZnO2/ppy in dark (f) Degradation of MB (5 ppm) by ZnO2/ppy in dark.
Figure 5(a) Degradation kinetics of various concentrations of RhB by ZnO2/ppy in dark (b)Degradation kinetics of RhB (25 ppm) based on source of irradiation (c) Degradation of RhB (25 ppm) by ZnO2 under UV light (d) Degradation of MB by ZnO2under UV light (e) degradation kinetic of RhB (40 ppm) by ZnO2/ppy in dark in presence and absence of sodium pyruvate (f)Temporal change in TOC during degradation of RhB and MB by ZnO2/ppy in dark.
Comparison of performance of different materials towards dye degradation.
| Composition | Dye | Concentration of dye (ppm) | Dark | Visible | UV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | k (min-1) × 10−2 | % | k (min-1) ×10−2 | % | k (min-1) ×10−2 | |||
| ZnO2/ppy | RhB | 10 | 100 | 35.6 | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S |
| ZnO2 | RhB | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 18 |
| ZnO2/ppy | RhB | 25 | 81 | 4.9 | 96 | 9.1 | 100 | 26 |
| ZnO2 | MB | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 32 |
| ZnO2/ppy | MB | 5 | 83 | 4 | 95 | 8.9 | 100 | 35 |
| Degussa TiO2 | RhB | 10 | — | — | N.S | N.S | 100 | 28 |
| TiO2 | RhB | 10 | — | — | N.S | N.S | 100 | 1.4 |
| TiO2/ppy | MB | 10 | — | — | 100 | 3.4 | N.S | N.S |
| TiO2/PANI | RhB | 10 | — | — | 100 | 3.39 | 100 | 11.3 |
| ZnO/PANI | MB | 10 | — | — | 85 | 0.41 | 10 | 6.6 |
| ZnO | RhB | 10 | — | — | N.S | N.S | 7.5 | 100 |
N.S.- not studied.
Figure 6Band structure and mechanism of generation of ROS under visible and UV light.