Literature DB >> 26469394

Individualized Risk Estimation for Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Oral Cavity Cancer.

Mahmoud I Awad1, Frank L Palmer1, Lei Kou2, Changhong Yu2, Pablo H Montero1, Andrew G Shuman1, Ian Ganly1, Jatin P Shah1, Michael W Kattan2, Snehal G Patel1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Postoperative complications after head and neck surgery carry the potential for significant morbidity. Estimating the risk of complications in an individual patient is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a statistical tool capable of predicting an individual patient's risk of developing a major complication after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective case series derived from an institutional clinical oncologic database, augmented by medical record abstraction, at an academic tertiary care cancer center. Participants were 506 previously untreated adult patients with biopsy-proven oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was a major postoperative complication requiring invasive intervention (Clavien-Dindo classification grades III-V). Patients treated between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008 (354 of 506 [70.0%]) comprised the modeling cohort and were used to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of developing the primary end point. Univariable analysis and correlation analysis were used to prescreen 36 potential predictors for incorporation in the subsequent multivariable logistic regression analysis. The variables with the highest predictive value were identified with the step-down model reduction method and included in the nomogram. Patients treated between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008 (152 of 506 [30.0%]) were used to validate the nomogram.
RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts for most comparisons. Thirty-six patients in the modeling cohort (10.2%) and 16 patients in the validation cohort (10.5%) developed a major postoperative complication. The 6 preoperative variables with the highest individual predictive value were incorporated within the nomogram, including body mass index, comorbidity status, preoperative white blood cell count, preoperative hematocrit, planned neck dissection, and planned tracheotomy. The nomogram predicted a major complication with a validated concordance index of 0.79. Inclusion of surgical operative variables in the nomogram maintained predictive accuracy (concordance index, 0.77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A statistical tool was developed that accurately estimates an individual patient's risk of developing a major complication after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26469394      PMCID: PMC4976497          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  32 in total

1.  Benchmarks for mortality, morbidity, and length of stay for head and neck surgical procedures.

Authors:  N Bhattacharyya; M P Fried
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-02

2.  Risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer and their prognostic implications.

Authors:  G M de Melo; K C Ribeiro ; L P Kowalski; D Deheinzelin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07

3.  The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.

Authors:  R D DRIPPS; A LAMONT; J E ECKENHOFF
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Complications encountered in a prospective series of 182 patients treated surgically for mouth cancer.

Authors:  M G McGurk; K F M Fan; A D MacBean; V Putcha
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Comorbidity as a major risk factor for mortality and complications in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Marciano B Ferrier; Emiel B Spuesens; Saskia Le Cessie; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-01

6.  Quality and performance indicators in an academic department of head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Randal S Weber; Carol M Lewis; Scott D Eastman; Ehab Y Hanna; Olubumi Akiwumi; Amy C Hessel; Stephen Y Lai; Leslie Kian; Michael E Kupferman; Dianna B Roberts
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-12

7.  Algorithm to predict postoperative complications in oropharyngeal and oral cavity carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Santoro; Marta Tagliabue; Maria Angela Massaro; Mohssen Ansarin; Luca Calabrese; Gioacchino Giugliano; Daniela Alterio; Maria Cossu Rocca; Enrica Grosso; Marek Plànicka; Marco Benazzo; Fausto Chiesa
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute.

Authors:  Cheng-Chun Wu; Pao-Yuan Lin; Khong-Yik Chew; Yur-Ren Kuo
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.425

9.  Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases.

Authors:  B H Haughey; E Wilson; L Kluwe; J Piccirillo; J Fredrickson; D Sessions; G Spector
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Comorbid condition as a prognostic factor for complications in major surgery of the oral cavity and oropharynx with microvascular soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Pepijn A Borggreven; Dirk J Kuik; Jasper J Quak; Remco de Bree; Gordon B Snow; C René Leemans
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  6 in total

1.  Complications in Mandibular Midline Distraction.

Authors:  Jan Pieter de Gijt; Atilla Gül; Eppo B Wolvius; Karel G H van der Wal; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-03-31

2.  Complications following transoral robotic surgery (TORS): A detailed institutional review of complications.

Authors:  Ashley Hay; Jocelyn Migliacci; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Jay O Boyle; Bhuvanesh Singh; Richard J Wong; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Association of Surgical and Hospital Volume and Patient Characteristics With 30-Day Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Gabriela Hernandez-Meza; Sean McKee; Daniel Carlton; Anthony Yang; Satish Govindaraj; Alfred Iloreta
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Postoperative Complications of Free Flap Reconstruction in Moderate-Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on Real-World Data.

Authors:  Delong Li; Chong Wang; Wei Wei; Bo Li; Huan Liu; Aoming Cheng; Qifang Niu; Zhengxue Han; Zhien Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Nomograms predicting long-term overall survival and cancer-specific survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Jun Ju; Jia Wang; Chao Ma; Yun Li; Zhenyan Zhao; Tao Gao; Qianwei Ni; Moyi Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09

6.  Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Survival Outcomes of Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer Following Curative Surgery.

Authors:  Yao-Te Tsai; Cheng-Ming Hsu; Geng-He Chang; Ming-Shao Tsai; Yi-Chan Lee; Ethan I Huang; Chia-Hsuan Lai; Ku-Hao Fang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.