Literature DB >> 28751944

Complications in Mandibular Midline Distraction.

Jan Pieter de Gijt1, Atilla Gül1, Eppo B Wolvius1, Karel G H van der Wal1, Maarten J Koudstaal1.   

Abstract

Mandibular midline distraction (MMD) is a relatively new surgical technique for correction of transverse discrepancies of the mandible. This study assesses the amount and burden of complications in MMD. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent MMD between 2002 and 2014. Patients with congenital deformities or a history of radiation therapy in the area of interest were excluded. Patient records were obtained and individually assessed for any complications. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system (CDS). Seventy-three patients were included of which 33 were males and 40 were females. The mean follow-up was 2.1 years. Twenty-nine patients had minor complications, grades I and II. Two patients had a grade IIIa and three patients had a grade IIIb complication. Common complications were pressure ulcers, dehiscence, and (transient) sensory disturbances of the mental nerve. This study shows that although MMD is a relatively safe method, complications can occur. Mostly the complications are mild, transient, and manageable without the need for any reoperation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien-Dindo; complications; mandibular midline distraction; orthognathic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28751944      PMCID: PMC5526687          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  11 in total

1.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  M Del Santo; C A Guerrero; P H Buschang; J D English; M L Samchukov; W H Bell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Anterior transmandibular osteodistraction: clinical and model observations.

Authors:  Maurice Y Mommaerts; Roger Polsbroek; Gert Santler; Pedro E G S Correia; Johan V S Abeloos; Nayeem Ali
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Complications during mandibular midline distraction.

Authors:  Julia von Bremen; Dominik Schäfer; Wolfgang Kater; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Can we predict which patients are likely to develop severe complications following reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis?

Authors:  Andrew J Lyons; Iain Nixon; Dionyssia Papadopoulou; Siobhan Crichton
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 5.  Mandibular midline distraction: a systematic review.

Authors:  J P de Gijt; K Vervoorn; E B Wolvius; K G H Van der Wal; M J Koudstaal
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Complications after free flap surgery: do we need a standardized classification of surgical complications?

Authors:  Christos Perisanidis; Beata Herberger; Nikolaos Papadogeorgakis; Rudolf Seemann; Christina Eder-Czembirek; Dietmar Tamandl; Georg Heinze; Panayiotis A Kyzas; Anastasios Kanatas; David Mitchell; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Individualized Risk Estimation for Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Awad; Frank L Palmer; Lei Kou; Changhong Yu; Pablo H Montero; Andrew G Shuman; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; Michael W Kattan; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  Long-term skeletal and dental stability of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with a hybrid distractor.

Authors:  John W King; James C Wallace; Daniel Luke Winter; Julia A Niculescu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Morbidity related to transmandibular distraction osteogenesis for patients with developmental deformities.

Authors:  Maurice Y Mommaerts; Yannick J E Spaey; Pedro E G Soares Correia; Gwen R J Swennen
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Current Practice for Transverse Mandibular and Maxillary Discrepancies in the Netherlands: A Web-Based Survey Among Orthodontists and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Authors:  Atilla Gül; Stephen T H Tjoa; Jan P de Gijt; Justin T van der Tas; Hadi Sutedja; Eppo B Wolvius; Karel G H van der Wal; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 2.  Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Annette Dalgaard Kjellerup; Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.