Importance: Thirty-day readmission rates have been suggested as a marker for quality of care. By investigating the factors associated with readmissions in all otolaryngology subspecialties we provide data relevant for the development of risk stratification systems to improve outcomes. Objective: To establish the association of surgical and hospital volume and patient characteristics with 30-day readmission rates to guide the development of otolaryngology-specific risk stratification models. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study including adult patients who underwent inpatient otolaryngology surgery in New York State between 1995 and 2015 was conducted using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). Regression techniques were used to describe relationships of patient-level factors, hospital, and surgeon volume to 30-day readmission rates in New York State. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level risk factors for readmission. Secondary outcome measures were rate of readmissions by subspecialty procedure and by diagnosis on readmission. Results: We identified 254 257 cases of otolaryngology surgery (147 065 women [58%], mean [SD] age 50 [17] years). The 30-day readmission rate was 6%. In a multivariable model, odds ratios (ORs) identified Medicaid insurance (OR, 1.46; 99% CI, 1.36-1.57), Medicare insurance (OR, 1.32; 99% CI, 1.24-1.42), bottom quartile income (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 1.01-1.15), patient comorbidities measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI >1; OR, 2.31; 99% CI, 2.16-2.47), length of stay (LOS) (LOS >10 days; OR, 2.29; 99% CI, 2.00-2.45), rhinology (OR, 1.37; 99% CI, 1.24-1.51), laryngology (OR, 1.98; 99% CI, 1.62-2.43), and head and neck cancer (OR, 1.27; 99% CI, 1.17-1.37) procedures as readmission predictors. High-volume surgeons were protective of 30-day readmission (OR, 0.67; 99% CI, 0.635-0.708) relative to low volume. Hospital volume was not significantly associated to readmissions. The most common causes of readmission included wound- (2682 patients, 18%), respiratory- (1776 patients, 12%), cardiovascular- (1210 patients, 8%), and volume- (1089 patients, 7%) related disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: This study evaluated the combined effects of patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level factors on 30-day readmission after otolaryngology surgery. Socioeconomic factors, patient comorbidities, surgeon volumes, and procedure were significantly associated with 30-day readmission. Though the cause of 30-day readmission is multifactorial, a large portion is driven by socioeconomic factors. Addressing these disparities at the system level is necessary to address the described readmission disparities. The development of risk-stratification models based on patient-, procedure-, and surgeon-level factors may help facilitate resource distribution.
Importance: Thirty-day readmission rates have been suggested as a marker for quality of care. By investigating the factors associated with readmissions in all otolaryngology subspecialties we provide data relevant for the development of risk stratification systems to improve outcomes. Objective: To establish the association of surgical and hospital volume and patient characteristics with 30-day readmission rates to guide the development of otolaryngology-specific risk stratification models. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study including adult patients who underwent inpatient otolaryngology surgery in New York State between 1995 and 2015 was conducted using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). Regression techniques were used to describe relationships of patient-level factors, hospital, and surgeon volume to 30-day readmission rates in New York State. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level risk factors for readmission. Secondary outcome measures were rate of readmissions by subspecialty procedure and by diagnosis on readmission. Results: We identified 254 257 cases of otolaryngology surgery (147 065 women [58%], mean [SD] age 50 [17] years). The 30-day readmission rate was 6%. In a multivariable model, odds ratios (ORs) identified Medicaid insurance (OR, 1.46; 99% CI, 1.36-1.57), Medicare insurance (OR, 1.32; 99% CI, 1.24-1.42), bottom quartile income (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 1.01-1.15), patient comorbidities measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI >1; OR, 2.31; 99% CI, 2.16-2.47), length of stay (LOS) (LOS >10 days; OR, 2.29; 99% CI, 2.00-2.45), rhinology (OR, 1.37; 99% CI, 1.24-1.51), laryngology (OR, 1.98; 99% CI, 1.62-2.43), and head and neck cancer (OR, 1.27; 99% CI, 1.17-1.37) procedures as readmission predictors. High-volume surgeons were protective of 30-day readmission (OR, 0.67; 99% CI, 0.635-0.708) relative to low volume. Hospital volume was not significantly associated to readmissions. The most common causes of readmission included wound- (2682 patients, 18%), respiratory- (1776 patients, 12%), cardiovascular- (1210 patients, 8%), and volume- (1089 patients, 7%) related disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: This study evaluated the combined effects of patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level factors on 30-day readmission after otolaryngology surgery. Socioeconomic factors, patient comorbidities, surgeon volumes, and procedure were significantly associated with 30-day readmission. Though the cause of 30-day readmission is multifactorial, a large portion is driven by socioeconomic factors. Addressing these disparities at the system level is necessary to address the described readmission disparities. The development of risk-stratification models based on patient-, procedure-, and surgeon-level factors may help facilitate resource distribution.
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Marianna Virtanen; Ichiro Kawachi; Solja T Nyberg; Lars Alfredsson; G David Batty; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Eric J Brunner; Hermann Burr; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Eleonor I Fransson; Mark Hamer; Katriina Heikkilä; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Ida E H Madsen; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jan H Pejtersen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Andrew Steptoe; Sakari Suominen; Töres Theorell; Jussi Vahtera; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Archana Singh-Manoux; Markus Jokela Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Joseph Kwok; Scott M Langevin; Athanassios Argiris; Jennifer R Grandis; William E Gooding; Emanuela Taioli Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mahmoud I Awad; Andrew G Shuman; Pablo H Montero; Frank L Palmer; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Daniel Jacobs; Samipya Kafle; Joseph Earles; Rahmatullah Rahmati; Saral Mehra; Benjamin L Judson Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2021-01-14