Literature DB >> 26468499

Sequence Variation in Amplification Target Genes and Standards Influences Interlaboratory Comparison of BK Virus DNA Load Measurement.

Morgane Solis1, Mariam Meddeb2, Charlotte Sueur1, Pilar Domingo-Calap3, Eric Soulier3, Angeline Chabaud2, Peggy Perrin4, Bruno Moulin5, Seiamak Bahram3, Françoise Stoll-Keller1, Sophie Caillard5, Heidi Barth1, Samira Fafi-Kremer6.   

Abstract

International guidelines define a BK virus (BKV) load of ≥4 log10 copies/ml as presumptive of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVN) and a cutoff for therapeutic intervention. To investigate whether BKV DNA loads (BKVL) are comparable between laboratories, 2 panels of 15 and 8 clinical specimens (urine, whole blood, and plasma) harboring different BKV genotypes were distributed to 20 and 27 French hospital centers in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Although 68% of the reported results fell within the acceptable range of the expected result ±0.5 log10, the interlaboratory variation ranged from 1.32 to 5.55 log10. Polymorphisms specific to BKV genotypes II and IV, namely, the number and position of mutations in amplification target genes and/or deletion in standards, arose as major sources of interlaboratory disagreements. The diversity of DNA purification methods also contributed to the interlaboratory variability, in particular for urine samples. Our data strongly suggest that (i) commercial external quality controls for BKVL assessment should include all major BKV genotypes to allow a correct evaluation of BKV assays, and (ii) the BKV sequence of commercial standards should be provided to users to verify the absence of mismatches with the primers and probes of their BKV assays. Finally, the optimization of primer and probe design and standardization of DNA extraction methods may substantially decrease interlaboratory variability and allow interinstitutional studies to define a universal cutoff for presumptive BKVN and, ultimately, ensure adequate patient care.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26468499      PMCID: PMC4652096          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02145-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  39 in total

1.  Impact of genomic sequence variability on quantitative PCR assays for diagnosis of polyomavirus BK infection.

Authors:  P Randhawa; J Kant; R Shapiro; H Tan; A Basu; C Luo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  BK virus in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  H H Hirsch; P Randhawa
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Martin G Zeier; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig; Henrik Ekberg; Catherine A Garvey; Michael D Green; Vivekanand Jha; Michelle A Josephson; Bryce A Kiberd; Henri A Kreis; Ruth A McDonald; John M Newmann; Gregorio T Obrador; Flavio G Vincenti; Michael Cheung; Amy Earley; Gowri Raman; Samuel Abariga; Martin Wagner; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Screening to prevent polyoma virus nephropathy in kidney transplantation: a cost analysis.

Authors:  F Smith; R Panek; B A Kiberd
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  A prospective longitudinal study of BK virus infection in 104 renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Bressollette-Bodin; M Coste-Burel; M Hourmant; V Sebille; E Andre-Garnier; B M Imbert-Marcille
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Marked variability of BK virus load measurement using quantitative real-time PCR among commonly used assays.

Authors:  Noah G Hoffman; Linda Cook; Ederlyn E Atienza; Ajit P Limaye; Keith R Jerome
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Risk factors for BK virus infection in the era of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Claire Borni-Duval; Sophie Caillard; Jérôme Olagne; Peggy Perrin; Laura Braun-Parvez; Françoise Heibel; Bruno Moulin
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Genotyping schemes for polyomavirus BK, using gene-specific phylogenetic trees and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis.

Authors:  Chunqing Luo; Marta Bueno; Jeffrey Kant; Jeremy Martinson; Parmjeet Randhawa
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Polyomavirus BK replication dynamics in vivo and in silico to predict cytopathology and viral clearance in kidney transplants.

Authors:  G A Funk; R Gosert; P Comoli; F Ginevri; H H Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  BK polyomavirus genotypes represent distinct serotypes with distinct entry tropism.

Authors:  Diana V Pastrana; Upasana Ray; Thomas G Magaldi; Rachel M Schowalter; Nicolas Çuburu; Christopher B Buck
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intravenous Immunoglobulin Administration Significantly Increases BKPyV Genotype-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Aurélie Velay; Morgane Solis; Ilies Benotmane; Pierre Gantner; Eric Soulier; Bruno Moulin; Sophie Caillard; Samira Fafi-Kremer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Neutralizing Antibody-Mediated Response and Risk of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy.

Authors:  Morgane Solis; Aurélie Velay; Raphaël Porcher; Pilar Domingo-Calap; Eric Soulier; Mélanie Joly; Mariam Meddeb; Wallys Kack-Kack; Bruno Moulin; Siamak Bahram; Françoise Stoll-Keller; Heidi Barth; Sophie Caillard; Samira Fafi-Kremer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  BK polyomavirus diversity-Why viral variation matters.

Authors:  Jason T Blackard; Stella M Davies; Benjamin L Laskin
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.989

4.  Calibration of BK Virus Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing to the 1st WHO International Standard for BK Virus.

Authors:  Susanna K Tan; Stephen Milligan; Malaya K Sahoo; Nathaniel Taylor; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Matrix Matters: Assessment of Commutability among BK Virus Assays and Standards.

Authors:  R T Hayden; Y Su; J Boonyaratanakornkit; L Cook; Z Gu; K R Jerome; B A Pinsky; S S Sam; S K Tan; H Zhu; L Tang; A M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 11.677

6.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA and the Prediction of BK Virus-associated Nephropathy.

Authors:  Sam Kant; Jonathan Bromberg; Mark Haas; Daniel Brennan
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-10-23

Review 7.  Donor Derived Cell Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: The Circa 2020-2021 Update.

Authors:  Sam Kant; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 8.  BK Polyomavirus and the Transplanted Kidney: Immunopathology and Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Caroline Lamarche; Julie Orio; Suzon Collette; Lynne Senécal; Marie-Josée Hébert; Édith Renoult; Lee Anne Tibbles; Jean-Sébastien Delisle
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Translating genomic exploration of the family Polyomaviridae into confident human polyomavirus detection.

Authors:  Sergio Kamminga; Igor A Sidorov; Michaël Tadesse; Els van der Meijden; Caroline de Brouwer; Hans L Zaaijer; Mariet C W Feltkamp; Alexander E Gorbalenya
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.