Literature DB >> 32424400

Choice of statistical model in observational studies of ART.

Laura E Dodge1,2,3, Leslie V Farland4, Katharine F B Correia5, Stacey A Missmer3,6, Emily A Seidler1,2,7, Jack Wilkinson8, Anna M Modest1,2, Michele R Hacker1,2,3.   

Abstract

Analyzing data on ART presents unique and sometimes complicated challenges related to choosing the unit(s) of analysis and the statistical model. In this commentary, we provide examples of how these challenges arise and guidance for overcoming them. We discuss the implications of different ways to count treatment cycles, considering the perspectives of research questions, data management and analysis and patient counseling. We present the advantages and disadvantages of different statistical models, and finally, we discuss the definition and calculation of the cumulative incidence of live birth, which is a key outcome of research on ART.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technologies; data analysis; data reporting; research methods; statistical models

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424400      PMCID: PMC7368396          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  23 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Methodological approaches to analyzing IVF data with multiple cycles.

Authors:  Jennifer Yland; Carmen Messerlian; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association?

Authors:  L V Farland; K F Correia; L A Wise; P L Williams; E S Ginsburg; S A Missmer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-17

7.  Analysis of multiple-cycle data from couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: methodologic issues and statistical approaches.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Kimberly R Pearson; Louise M Ryan; John D Meeker; Daniel W Cramer; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  IVF success corrected for drop-out: use of inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Anna M Modest; Lauren A Wise; Matthew P Fox; Jennifer Weuve; Alan S Penzias; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  Alice D Domar; Kristin Rooney; Michele R Hacker; Denny Sakkas; Laura E Dodge
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; David McLernon; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  6 in total

1.  History of cancer and fertility treatment outcomes: a registry linkage study in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Judy E Stern; Sunah S Hwang; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard Cabral; Richard Knowlton; Susan T Gershman; Charles C Coddington; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments.

Authors:  Jack Wilkinson; Katie Stocking
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-06-17

3.  Hormonal Replacement Treatment for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer With or Without GnRH Agonist Pretreatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study Stratified by Times of Embryo Implantation Failures.

Authors:  Leizhen Xia; Lifeng Tian; Shanshan Zhang; Jialyu Huang; Qiongfang Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Association of the Serum Folate and Total Calcium and Magnesium Levels Before Ovarian Stimulation With Outcomes of Fresh In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Normogonadotropic Women.

Authors:  Mikhail Polzikov; Dmitry Blinov; Zarema Barakhoeva; Lyudmila Vovk; Yulia Fetisova; Maria Ovchinnikova; Marina Tischenko; Irina Zorina; Vasily Yurasov; Tatyana Ushakova; Oleg Sergeyev
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  Female dietary patterns and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sanderman; Sydney K Willis; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Increased blastomere number is associated with higher live birth rate in day 3 embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lifeng Tian; Leizhen Xia; Hongbo Liu; Yan Kou; Zhihui Huang; Xingwu Wu; Lu Fan; Jialyu Huang; Qiongfang Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.