Literature DB >> 33844187

Do Strategies Favoring Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Have an Impact on Differences in IVF Success Rate, Multiple Pregnancy Rate, and Cost per Live Birth Between Fertility Clinics?

Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti1, Andrea Busnelli2,3, Roberto De Luca4, Giulia Scaravelli4.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to establish whether strategies favoring frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) have an impact on differences in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), weighted mean cost per live birth, and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) between fertility clinics. Data were extracted from the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Italian National Registry and refer to classical IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles performed in 2018 in public funded Lombardy region fertility clinics. Propensity to FET cycles was expressed with the so-called freezing tendency index (FTI): [(No. of FETs + No. of transfers of embryos obtained from frozen-thawed oocytes) / (No. of fresh ETs + No. of canceled IVF cycles + Numerator)] × 100. Fertility clinics were divided according to their FTI: group A (FTI: 0-20%); group B (FTI: 20-40%); and group C (FTI: 40-60%). Groups A, B, and C included 6, 8, and 8 fertility clinics, respectively. The CLBR (95% CI) per started COH cycle was 13.1% (11.8-14.5%) in group A, 19.6% (18.6-20.7%) in group B, and 27.8% (26.8-28.9%) in group C (p < 0.0001). The weighted mean live birth cost was 32,770 ± 10,662 € in group A, 25,863 ± 11,510 € in group B, and 20,426 ± 3788 € in group C (p < 0.0001). The MPR (95% CI) was 15.4% (12.1-19.4%) in group A, 10.2% (8.7-12.1%) in group B (p = 0.0065), and 6.3% (5.2-7.6%) in group C (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, our results suggest that strategies favoring FET cycles are associated with an increased CLBR, a decreased weighted mean cost per live birth, and a decreased MPR.
© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost per live birth; Cumulative live birth rate; Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; Multiple pregnancy rate

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844187     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00555-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  2 in total

Review 1.  Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; David McLernon; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Tjitske Zaat; Miriam Zagers; Femke Mol; Mariëtte Goddijn; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.