Literature DB >> 26465126

Predicting Late-stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Receipt of Adjuvant Therapy: Applying Current Spatial Access to Care Methods in Appalachia.

Joseph Donohoe1, Vince Marshall, Xi Tan, Fabian T Camacho, Roger Anderson, Rajesh Balkrishnan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method of measuring access to care has never been used to study cancer disparities in Appalachia. First, we evaluated the 2SFCA method in relation to traditional methods. We then examined the impact of access to mammography centers and primary care on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and receipt of adjuvant hormonal therapy.
METHODS: Cancer registries from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina were linked with Medicare data to identify the stage of breast cancer diagnosis for Appalachia women diagnosed between 2006 and 2008. Women eligible for adjuvant therapy had stage I, II, or III diagnosis; mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery; and hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Geographically weighted regression was used to explore nonstationarity in the demographic and spatial access predictor variables.
RESULTS: Over 21% of 15,299 women diagnosed with breast cancer had late-stage (stages III-IV) diagnosis. Predictors included age at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR)=0.86; P<0.001], insurance status (OR=1.32; P<0.001), county primary care to population ratio (OR=0.95; P<0.001), and primary-care 2SFCA score (OR=0.96; P=0.006). Only 46.9% of eligible women received adjuvant hormonal therapy, and predictors included comorbidity status (OR=1.18; P=0.047), county economic status (OR=1.32; P=0.006), and mammography center 2SFCA scores (OR=1.12; P=0.021).
CONCLUSIONS: Methodologically, the 2SFCA method offered the greatest predictive validity of the access measures examined. Substantively, rates of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and adjuvant hormonal therapy are substandard in Appalachia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26465126      PMCID: PMC4610181          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  30 in total

1.  A new index of access to primary care services in rural areas.

Authors:  Matthew R McGrail; John S Humphreys
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 2.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in Appalachia: does geography matter?

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Tse-Chang Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Fabian Camacho; Teresa Kern; Heath B Mackley; Gretchen Kimmick; Christopher Louis; Eugene Lengerich; Nengliang Yao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  M T Ruffin; D W Gorenflo; B Woodman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

5.  The role of race and residence in determining stage at diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  C H Amey; M K Miller; S L Albrecht
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Receipt of Regular Primary Care and Early Cancer Detection in Appalachia.

Authors:  Fabian Camacho; Wenke Hwang; Teresa Kern; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Correlates of HPV vaccination among adolescent females from Appalachia and reasons why their parents do not intend to vaccinate.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004.

Authors:  Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; Harold J Burstein; Antonio C Wolff; Kathleen I Pritchard; James N Ingle; Rowan T Chlebowski; Richard Gelber; Stephan B Edge; Julie Gralow; Melody A Cobleigh; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lori J Goldstein; Timothy J Whelan; Trevor J Powles; John Bryant; Cheryl Perkins; Judy Perotti; Susan Braun; Amy S Langer; George P Browman; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparing GIS-based measures in access to mammography and their validity in predicting neighborhood risk of late-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Lian; James Struthers; Mario Schootman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Change in geographic access to community health centers after Health Center Program expansion.

Authors:  Leigh Evans; Martin P Charns; Howard J Cabral; M Patricia Fabian
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Geographic disparities in adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in Appalachian women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi Tan; Fabian Camacho; Vincent D Marshall; Joseph Donohoe; Roger T Anderson; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2016-08-25

3.  Overexpression of AKIP1 predicts poor prognosis of patients with breast carcinoma and promotes cancer metastasis through Akt/GSK-3β/Snail pathway.

Authors:  Dan Mo; Xinning Li; Chunhong Li; Junrong Liang; Tian Zeng; Naiwei Su; Qipei Jiang; Jingjing Huang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Challenging terrains: socio-spatial analysis of Primary Health Care Access Disparities in West Virginia.

Authors:  Insu Hong; Bradley Wilson; Thomson Gross; Jamison Conley; Theodore Powers
Journal:  Appl Spat Anal Policy       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates Among US Counties.

Authors:  Chelsea Herbert; Alessandro Paro; Adrian Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Measuring Spatial Accessibility of Health Care Providers - Introduction of a Variable Distance Decay Function within the Floating Catchment Area (FCA) Method.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; David A Groneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exploring neighborhood inequality in female breast cancer incidence in Tehran using Bayesian spatial models and a spatial scan statistic.

Authors:  Erfan Ayubi; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Ali Ghanbari Motlagh; Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi; Ali Hosseini; Kamran Yazdani
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2017-05-17

9.  Geographical Accessibility of Community Health Assist System General Practitioners for the Elderly Population in Singapore: A Case Study on the Elderly Living in Housing Development Board Flats.

Authors:  Ong Ming Lee Deborah; Marcus Yu Lung Chiu; Kai Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Medicaid Expansion and Breast Cancer Screening in Appalachia and Non-Appalachia, United States, BRFSS 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  Nimish Valvi; Neomi Vin-Raviv; Tomi Akinyemiju
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.