Literature DB >> 34585297

Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates Among US Counties.

Chelsea Herbert1,2, Alessandro Paro2, Adrian Diaz3,4,5, Timothy M Pawlik2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Not all Americans may benefit equally from current improvements in breast and colorectal cancer screening and mortality rates.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of county-level screening, incidence, and mortality rates for breast and colon cancer utilizing three publicly available data sources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and their association with the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a measure of local economic prosperity across communities.
RESULTS: After controlling for other factors, DCI was associated with county-level screening, incidence, and death rates per 100,000 for breast and colorectal cancer. There was an absolute increase of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001) in the proportion of women aged 40 years or older who had a screening mammogram for every 10-point decrease in DCI, which in turn correlated with an increase in the age-adjusted incidence by 1.68 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.37-2.00, p < 0.001). While the age-adjusted death rate for breast cancer was highest in the most distressed communities, the overall incidence of age-adjusted death decreased by 0.28 per 100,000 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.19, p < 0.001) with every 10-point decrease in DCI. For colorectal cancer, every 10-point decrease in DCI was similarly associated with an absolute 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69, p < 0.001) increase in the proportion of individuals who had screening endoscopy. Increased colorectal screening in low-DCI counties was associated with a lower age-adjusted incidence rate (-0.80 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.65) and age-adjusted death rate (-0.55 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.49) of colorectal cancer per every 10-point decrease in DCI (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The association of county-level socioeconomic and healthcare factors with breast and colorectal cancer outcomes was notable, with level of community distress impacting cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34585297     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10849-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  41 in total

Review 1.  Current Prevalence of Major Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Test Use in the United States: Disparities by Education and Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Ann Goding Sauer; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Disparities by Race, Age, and Sex in the Improvement of Survival for Major Cancers: Results From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Chenjie Zeng; Wanqing Wen; Alicia K Morgans; William Pao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Colorectal carcinoma in poor blacks.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Tarek A Alshafie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care.

Authors:  Mita Sanghavi Goel; Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after cancer surgery: failure to rescue.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival in the United States, 1950-2014: Over Six Decades of Changing Patterns and Widening Inequalities.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2017-03-20

7.  Small Area Estimation of Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Behaviors in US Counties by Combining Two Large National Health Surveys.

Authors:  Benmei Liu; Van Parsons; Eric J Feuer; Qiang Pan; Machell Town; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Nathaniel Schenker; Dawei Xie
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Factors Associated With Cancer Disparities Among Low-, Medium-, and High-Income US Counties.

Authors:  Jeremy M O'Connor; Tannaz Sedghi; Meera Dhodapkar; Michael J Kane; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-10-05

10.  Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.

Authors:  Shaneda Warren Andersen; William J Blot; Loren Lipworth; Mark Steinwandel; Harvey J Murff; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Community distress as a predictor of early hernia recurrence for older adults undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).

Authors:  Savannah M Renshaw; Molly A Olson; Benjamin K Poulose; Courtney E Collins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.453

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.