Literature DB >> 10682879

Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.

M T Ruffin1, D W Gorenflo, B Woodman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As we enter the year 2000, it is worth looking at whether primary care practices are reaching the goals established in Healthy People 2000 for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer screening. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the current rates of cancer screening; and (2) to determine which factors predict completion of a single screening test, of all tests for each cancer, and of all procedures for age and sex.
METHODS: Medical records of 200 eligible patients (100 men and 100 women) from each of 24 community-based primary care practices were abstracted for cancer-screening events.
RESULTS: We audited 5125 charts. A Papanicolaou smear was documented for 63.8% of women with an intact cervix within 3 years of the audit.. We found that 46.8% of women had documentation of ever having a discussion of breast self-examination. For breast cancer screening, 41.8% of the women had a clinical breast examination within 1 year, 48.2% aged 40 to 49 years had a mammogram within 2 years, and 38.5% aged 50 years and older had a mammogram within 1 year. Only 29% of women aged 40 to 49 years and 17% of women 50 years and older were current for all breast cancer-screening tests. Among patients 50 years and older, 33% of men and 38% of women had a digital rectal examination within 1 year, 26% of men and 28% of women had a fecal occult blood test within 1 year, and 22% of men and 16.8% of women had a flexible sigmoidoscopy within 5 years. Of all men 28.7% had a prostate-specific antigen test within 1 year. Completion of all tests relevant for age and sex were documented for 8.6% of women aged 40 to 49 years, 3% of women 50 years and older, and 5% of men 50 years and older. The single most significant predictor of documented cancer screening was a health maintenance visit.
CONCLUSIONS: This sample of primary care clinicians has not reached the goals set in Healthy People 2000 for cancer screening. Interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of patients who schedule a health maintenance visit could serve to increase cancer screening and help us reach goals set for the year 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10682879     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.13.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract        ISSN: 0893-8652


  38 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Assessing endoscopic colorectal screening adherence in an emergency department population.

Authors:  Jennifer Christie; Denise Nassisi; Ilene Wilets; Katherine N DuHamel; Gary Winkel; Rhadjena Hilliard; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Determinants of non-compliance to recommendations on breast cancer screening among women participating in the French E3N cohort study.

Authors:  Camille Flamant; Estelle Gauthier; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Adolescent health. Does primary care intervention make a difference?

Authors:  Inge Schabort; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague; Donald L Weaver; Anne Marie McCarthy; Chyke A Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ann G Zauber; William E Barlow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Screening for Barrett's esophagus: results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Milli Gupta; Timothy J Beebe; Kelly T Dunagan; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; Nicholas J Talley; G Richard Locke; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The relationship between medical students' knowledge, confidence, experience, and skills related to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Luann Wilkerson; Arianne Teherani
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  What Factors are Associated with Where Women Undergo Clinical Breast Examination? Results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Susan A Sabatino; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Open Clin Cancer J       Date:  2008

10.  Race moderates the relationship between obesity and colorectal cancer screening in women.

Authors:  Lucia A Leone; Marci K Campbell; Jessie A Satia; J Michael Bowling; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.