Literature DB >> 2646487

Quality of life, health status, and clinical research.

M Bergner1.   

Abstract

Although interest is increasing in measurement of quality of life, health status, and functional status in clinical research, most often the primary focus of the research is traditional measures of mortality and morbidity. Quality-of-life assessments are usually added as an afterthought once the design, data collection, and analytic techniques have been specified. When nonmedical outcomes are considered, they are thought of as quality-of-life outcomes. Quality of life is not well conceptualized in the medical and health literature. In addition, clinical researchers are searching for a single best measure of quality of life. Lack of information about clinical significance and sensitivity and uncertainties about the advantages of different administration strategies are impediments to use of developed measures. These issues and problems are discussed and suggestions made about procedures and investigations that could provide guidance.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2646487     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  42 in total

1.  Do we know what global ratings of health-related quality of life measure?

Authors:  B Mozes; Y Maor; A Shmueli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health status among urban African American women: associations among well-being, perceived stress, and demographic factors.

Authors:  Deborah Rohm Young; Xiaoxing He; Jeanine Genkinger; Marcella Sapun; Iris Mabry; Megan Jehn
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-02

3.  Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Operational aspects of Quality-of-Life Assessment. Choosing the right instrument.

Authors:  P Erickson; R C Taeuber; J Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Evaluating mental health care reform: including the clinician, client, and family perspective.

Authors:  B Dickey; H Wagenaar
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1994

6.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 7.  [Quality of life after radical urologic pelvic surgery and impact of inpatient rehabilitation].

Authors:  O Dombo; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Effects of enzyme replacement therapy on pain and health related quality of life in patients with Fabry disease: data from FOS (Fabry Outcome Survey).

Authors:  B Hoffmann; A Garcia de Lorenzo; A Mehta; M Beck; U Widmer; R Ricci
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Health-related quality of life in children with hemifacial microsomia: parent and child perspectives.

Authors:  Mary A Khetani; Brent R Collett; Matthew L Speltz; Martha M Werler
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.225

10.  Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

Authors:  P D Cleary; D T Reilly; S Greenfield; A G Mulley; L Wexler; F Frankel; B J McNeil
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.