Literature DB >> 10155292

Operational aspects of Quality-of-Life Assessment. Choosing the right instrument.

P Erickson1, R C Taeuber, J Scott.   

Abstract

In assessing quality of life, the most important goal is to develop a strategy that produces useable and useful information for decision making. Assessment design is complex, and whether an assessment is developed from scratch, or 1 or more portions of existing instruments are adapted, the focus must be on the quality of the theoretical and operational elements of the particular line of inquiry and its environment. The necessary and most often discussed focus on the theoretical dimensions of validity, reliability and responsiveness is not sufficient to insure that the data are of the requisite high quality. There is also a need, almost universally given little attention in the literature, to look at operational aspects, such as design, format, flow, appearance, and response-stimulus, of each assessment instrument. Searching for guidance in the quality-of-life (QOL) literature remains a challenge even with computers, modems, keywords, static guidebooks and bibliographic systems. The On-Line Guide to Quality-of-Life Assessments (OLGA) is presented as a personal computer-based system that is updated 3 times a year to provide QOL researchers and assessment developers with 2 databases: assessments providing full descriptions and contact information; and references providing fully keyed citations to the assessment use literature. These databases are made more useful by decision-logical programs that identify relevant assessments and supporting research literature. OLGA can thus save time and other resources by helping investigators concentrate on the most relevant elements of the existing literature. This focus will assist them in avoiding the problems of ending up with the right answers to the wrong questions.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155292     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  19 in total

1.  Consequences of variation in treatment for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C L Pashos; B J McNeil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Quality of life, health status, and clinical research.

Authors:  M Bergner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  On the status of the Prostate Disease Assessment Team.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; S Ahmedzai
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1988

6.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 7.  Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection.

Authors:  M Bergner; M L Rothman
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  The AIMS approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties.

Authors:  R F Meenan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; L B Berman; M Townsend; S O Pugsley; L W Chambers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  A method to select an instrument for measurement of HR-QOL for cross-cultural adaptation applied to dermatology.

Authors:  A G de Tiedra; J Mercadal; X Badía; J M Mascaró; R Lozano
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Quality of life: an overview of the concept and measures.

Authors:  S Dedhiya; S X Kong
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1995-09-22

Review 3.  Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science.

Authors:  Stephen P McKenna
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Study protocol of psychometric properties of the Spanish translation of a competence test in evidence based practice: the Fresno test.

Authors:  Josep M Argimon-Pallàs; Gemma Flores-Mateo; Josep Jiménez-Villa; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera; Gonçal Foz; Magda Bundó-Vidiella; Sebastià Juncosa; Cruz M Fuentes-Bellido; Belén Pérez-Rodríguez; Francesc Margalef-Pallarès; Rosa Villafafila-Ferrero; Dolors Forès-Garcia; Josep Roman-Martínez; Esther Vilert-Garroga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.