BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most kidney donors view their experience positively, but some may experience psychosocial and financial burdens. We hypothesized that certain donor characteristics, poor outcome of the recipient, negative perceptions of care, and lack of support may be associated with poor psychosocial outcomes for donors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Renal and Lung Living Donors Evaluation Study (RELIVE) examined long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes for kidney donors (at three U.S. transplant centers) who donated between 1963 and 2005. Standardized questionnaires evaluated donor perspectives, recovery time, social support, motivation, financial impact, insurability after donation, and current psychological status. Questionnaires were mailed to 6909 donors. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 2455 donors, who had donated 17 ± 10 years earlier (range, 5-48 years), a response rate of 36%. Most (95%) rated their overall donation experience as good to excellent. Rating the overall donor experience more negatively was associated with donor complications, psychological difficulties, recipient graft failure, and longer time since donation. Nine percent (n=231) reported one or more of the following poor psychosocial outcomes: fair or poor overall donor experience, financial burden, regret or discomfort with decision to donate, or psychological difficulties since donation. Recipient graft failure was the only predictor for reporting one or more of these poor psychosocial outcomes (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.33 to 2.34). Donors with lower educational attainment experienced greater financial burden. One of five employed donors took unpaid leave; 2% reported health and life insurability concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of donors viewed their overall donation experience positively, almost 1 in 10 donors reported at least one negative consequence related to donation. Recipient graft failure was associated with poor psychosocial outcome, defined as one or more of these negative consequences. Some donors were financially disadvantaged, and some experienced insurance difficulties. Interventions to avoid negative psychosocial and financial consequences are warranted.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most kidney donors view their experience positively, but some may experience psychosocial and financial burdens. We hypothesized that certain donor characteristics, poor outcome of the recipient, negative perceptions of care, and lack of support may be associated with poor psychosocial outcomes for donors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Renal and Lung Living Donors Evaluation Study (RELIVE) examined long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes for kidney donors (at three U.S. transplant centers) who donated between 1963 and 2005. Standardized questionnaires evaluated donor perspectives, recovery time, social support, motivation, financial impact, insurability after donation, and current psychological status. Questionnaires were mailed to 6909 donors. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 2455 donors, who had donated 17 ± 10 years earlier (range, 5-48 years), a response rate of 36%. Most (95%) rated their overall donation experience as good to excellent. Rating the overall donor experience more negatively was associated with donor complications, psychological difficulties, recipient graft failure, and longer time since donation. Nine percent (n=231) reported one or more of the following poor psychosocial outcomes: fair or poor overall donor experience, financial burden, regret or discomfort with decision to donate, or psychological difficulties since donation. Recipient graft failure was the only predictor for reporting one or more of these poor psychosocial outcomes (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.33 to 2.34). Donors with lower educational attainment experienced greater financial burden. One of five employed donors took unpaid leave; 2% reported health and life insurability concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of donors viewed their overall donation experience positively, almost 1 in 10 donors reported at least one negative consequence related to donation. Recipient graft failure was associated with poor psychosocial outcome, defined as one or more of these negative consequences. Some donors were financially disadvantaged, and some experienced insurance difficulties. Interventions to avoid negative psychosocial and financial consequences are warranted.
Authors: E S Woodle; J A Daller; M Aeder; R Shapiro; T Sandholm; V Casingal; D Goldfarb; R M Lewis; J Goebel; M Siegler Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: K Clemens; N Boudville; M A Dew; C Geddes; J S Gill; V Jassal; S Klarenbach; G Knoll; N Muirhead; G V R Prasad; L Storsley; D Treleaven; A X Garg; A Garg Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Alan Leichtman; Michael Abecassis; Mark Barr; Marian Charlton; David Cohen; Dennis Confer; Mathew Cooper; Gabriel Danovitch; Connie Davis; Francis Delmonico; Mary Amanda Dew; Cathy Garvey; Robert Gaston; John Gill; Brenda Gillespie; Hassan Ibrahim; Cheryl Jacobs; Jeffery Kahn; Bert Kasiske; Joseph Kim; Krista Lentine; Marti Manyalich; Jose Medina-Pestana; Robert Merion; Marva Moxey-Mims; Jonah Odim; Gerhard Opelz; Janice Orlowski; Abid Rizvi; John Roberts; Dorry L Segev; Tina Sledge; Robert Steiner; Sandra Taler; Steven Textor; Gil Thiel; Amy Waterman; Errol Williams; Robert Wolfe; James Wynn; Arthur J Matas Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: A DiMartini; R J Cruz; M A Dew; M G Fitzgerald; L Chiappetta; L Myaskovsky; M E DeVera Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jessica M Ruck; Courtenay M Holscher; Tanjala S Purnell; Allan B Massie; Macey L Henderson; Dorry L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jennifer L Alejo; Xun Luo; Allan B Massie; Macey L Henderson; Sandra R DiBrito; Jayme E Locke; Tanjala S Purnell; Brian J Boyarsky; Saad Anjum; Samantha E Halpern; Dorry L Segev Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Colin M E Halverson; Jackie Y Wang; Michael Poulson; Jennifer Karlin; Megan Crowley-Matoka; Lainie F Ross Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Emma K Massey; Mathilde C Pronk; Willij C Zuidema; Willem Weimar; Jacqueline van de Wetering; Sohal Y Ismail Journal: Br J Health Psychol Date: 2021-07-22