Literature DB >> 26462012

Increased Adoption of Quality Improvement Interventions to Implement Evidence-Based Practices for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in U.S. Academic Medical Centers.

William V Padula1, Manish K Mishra2, Mary Beth F Makic3, Heidi L Wald4, Jonathan D Campbell5, Kavita V Nair6, Robert J Valuck6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services enacted a nonpayment policy for stage III and IV hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), which incentivized hospitals to improve prevention efforts. In response, hospitals looked for ways to support implementation of evidence-based practices for HAPU prevention, such as adoption of quality improvement (QI) interventions. The objective of this study was to quantify adoption patterns of QI interventions for supporting evidence-based practices for HAPU prevention.
METHODS: This study surveyed wound care specialists working at hospitals within the University HealthSystem Consortium. A questionnaire was used to retrospectively describe QI adoption patterns according to 25 HAPU-specific QI interventions into four domains: leadership, staff, information technology (IT), and performance and improvement. Respondents indicated QI interventions implemented between 2007 and 2012 to the nearest quarter and year. Descriptive statistics defined patterns of QI adoption. A t-test and statistical process control chart established statistically significant increase in adoption following nonpayment policy enactment in October 2008. Increase are described in terms of scope (number of QI domains employed) and scale (number of QI interventions within domains).
RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 55 hospitals surveyed reported implementing QI interventions for HAPU prevention. Leadership interventions were most frequent, increasing in scope from 40% to 63% between 2008 and 2012; "annual programs to promote pressure ulcer prevention" showed the greatest increase in scale. Staff interventions increased in scope from 32% to 53%; "frequent consult driven huddles" showed the greatest increase in scale. IT interventions increased in scope from 31% to 55%. Performance and improvement interventions increased in scope from 18% to 40%, with "new skin care products . . ." increasing the most. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Academic medical centers increased adoption of QI interventions following changes in nonpayment policy. These QI interventions supported adherence to implementation of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. Changes in payment policies for prevention are effective in QI efforts.
© 2015 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; hospital-acquired condition; pressure ulcer; prevention; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26462012     DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  9 in total

1.  Are Evidence-based Practices Associated With Effective Prevention of Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in US Academic Medical Centers?

Authors:  William V Padula; Robert D Gibbons; Robert J Valuck; Mary B F Makic; Manish K Mishra; Peter J Pronovost; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Systematic review of the use of Statistical Process Control methods to measure the success of pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Clark; Trudie Young; Maureen Fallon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pressure injury identification, measurement, coding, and reporting: Key challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Esther R Gershenzon; Sue M Evans; Victoria Team; John J McNeil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Leveraging financial incentives and behavioural economics to engage physicians in achieving quality-improvement process measures.

Authors:  Husein Moloo; Tyler Lamb; Sudhir Sundaresan; Kednapa Thavorn; Caolan Walsh; Reilly Musselman; Alan Forster
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model.

Authors:  William V Padula; Robert D Gibbons; Peter J Pronovost; Donald Hedeker; Manish K Mishra; Mary Beth F Makic; John Fp Bridges; Heidi L Wald; Robert J Valuck; Adam J Ginensky; Anthony Ursitti; Laura Ruth Venable; Ziv Epstein; David O Meltzer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.

Authors:  Sally M Havers; Elizabeth Kate Martin; Andrew Wilson; Lisa Hall
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-05-04

7.  Effectiveness and Value of Prophylactic 5-Layer Foam Sacral Dressings to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Acute Care Hospitals: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  William V Padula
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

8.  Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  William V Padula; Peter J Pronovost; Mary Beth F Makic; Heidi L Wald; Dane Moran; Manish K Mishra; David O Meltzer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Investing in Skilled Specialists to Grow Hospital Infrastructure for Quality Improvement.

Authors:  William V Padula; Madhuram Nagarajan; Patricia M Davidson; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.243

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.