| Literature DB >> 29266876 |
Carolina D Weller1, Esther R Gershenzon2, Sue M Evans3, Victoria Team1, John J McNeil3.
Abstract
Pressure injury (PI) rates are a commonly used indicator of performance of health care facilities, both in acute and subacute settings. However, measuring PI rates in an accurate and reproducible fashion has been challenging. The consequences of poor measurement may include failure to identify poorly performing institutions or incorrect accusations of poor quality care. In this article, we describe the main challenges in identification, coding, and reporting of PIs. Issues include inconsistent identification of PIs at the time of admission, variations in the intensity of PI detection, and differing approaches to coding and the adjustment for differing risks amongst different patient population. These are compounded by differences in the epidemiological approach because rates will differ according to whether patients are surveyed cross-sectionally (eg, on a set day per month) or if the survey is undertaken at discharge. In some cases, financial incentives may also influence PI reporting. We also discuss potential strategies for improving data collection and benchmarking as an aid to reducing PI prevalence.Entities:
Keywords: HAPI; coding of pressure injuries; pressure injury identification; pressure injury prevalence; quality of care indicators
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29266876 PMCID: PMC7949636 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Wound J ISSN: 1742-4801 Impact factor: 3.315