Literature DB >> 29266876

Pressure injury identification, measurement, coding, and reporting: Key challenges and opportunities.

Carolina D Weller1, Esther R Gershenzon2, Sue M Evans3, Victoria Team1, John J McNeil3.   

Abstract

Pressure injury (PI) rates are a commonly used indicator of performance of health care facilities, both in acute and subacute settings. However, measuring PI rates in an accurate and reproducible fashion has been challenging. The consequences of poor measurement may include failure to identify poorly performing institutions or incorrect accusations of poor quality care. In this article, we describe the main challenges in identification, coding, and reporting of PIs. Issues include inconsistent identification of PIs at the time of admission, variations in the intensity of PI detection, and differing approaches to coding and the adjustment for differing risks amongst different patient population. These are compounded by differences in the epidemiological approach because rates will differ according to whether patients are surveyed cross-sectionally (eg, on a set day per month) or if the survey is undertaken at discharge. In some cases, financial incentives may also influence PI reporting. We also discuss potential strategies for improving data collection and benchmarking as an aid to reducing PI prevalence.
© 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAPI; coding of pressure injuries; pressure injury identification; pressure injury prevalence; quality of care indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29266876      PMCID: PMC7949636          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  51 in total

Review 1.  Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement.

Authors:  Denis Anthony; Sam Parboteeah; Mohammad Saleh; Panos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 2.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Theo Dassen; Antje Tannen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  The value of reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence: an illustrative analysis.

Authors:  Joanne Spetz; Diane S Brown; Carolyn Aydin; Nancy Donaldson
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.737

4.  Consistency of pressure injury documentation across interfacility transfers.

Authors:  Lee Squitieri; David A Ganz; Carol M Mangione; Jack Needleman; Patrick S Romano; Debra Saliba; Clifford Y Ko; Daniel A Waxman
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  The International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ Survey: 2006-2015: A 10-Year Pressure Injury Prevalence and Demographic Trend Analysis by Care Setting.

Authors:  Catherine VanGilder; Charlie Lachenbruch; Corrine Algrim-Boyle; Stephanie Meyer
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.741

6.  Pressure ulcer prevalence, use of preventive measures, and mortality risk in an acute care population: a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Siv Leijon; Ingrid Bergh; Karin Terstappen
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

7.  Prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in Japanese long-term-care hospitals.

Authors:  Ayumi Igarashi; Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani; Yukino Gushiken; Yukari Takai; Makoto Tanaka; Yuko Okamoto
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among hospitalised patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Saleh; Denis Anthony; Sam Parboteeah
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: results from the national Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System study.

Authors:  Courtney H Lyder; Yun Wang; Mark Metersky; Maureen Curry; Rebecca Kliman; Nancy R Verzier; David R Hunt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Richard F Averill; John S Hughes; Richard L Fuller; Norbert I Goldfield
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.852

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient education materials on pressure injury prevention in hospitals and health services in Victoria, Australia: Availability and content analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Ayoub Bouguettaya; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Angela Jones; Helena Teede; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Pressure injury identification, measurement, coding, and reporting: Key challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Esther R Gershenzon; Sue M Evans; Victoria Team; John J McNeil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Clinical Coders' Perspectives on Pressure Injury Coding in Acute Care Services in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Carolina Dragica Weller; Louise Turnour; Elizabeth Connelly; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Victoria Team
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Pressure Injury Prevention in COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Lydia Team; Angela Jones; Helena Teede; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 5.  Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for Various Wounds.

Authors:  Chenyu Shi; Chenyu Wang; He Liu; Qiuju Li; Ronghang Li; Yan Zhang; Yuzhe Liu; Ying Shao; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.