Literature DB >> 29446244

Systematic review of the use of Statistical Process Control methods to measure the success of pressure ulcer prevention.

Michael Clark1, Trudie Young1, Maureen Fallon1.   

Abstract

Successful prevention of pressure ulcers is the end product of a complex series of care processes including, but not limited to, the assessment of vulnerability to pressure damage; skin assessment and care; nutritional support; repositioning; and the use of beds, mattresses, and cushions to manage mechanical loads on the skin and soft tissues. The purpose of this review was to examine where and how Statistical Process Control (SPC) measures have been used to assess the success of quality improvement initiatives intended to improve pressure ulcer prevention. A search of 7 electronic bibliographic databases was performed on May 17th, 2017, for studies that met the inclusion criteria. SPC methods have been reported in 9 publications since 2010 to interpret changes in the incidence of pressure ulcers over time. While these methods offer rapid interpretation of changes in incidence than is gained from a comparison of 2 arbitrarily selected time points pre- and post-implementation of change, more work is required to ensure that the clinical and scientific communities adopt the most appropriate SPC methods.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incidence; pressure ulcer prevention; prevalence; quality improvement; statistical process control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446244      PMCID: PMC7949906          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

Review 1.  Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement.

Authors:  J C Benneyan; R C Lloyd; P E Plsek
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

2.  Transforming care strategies and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy Chaboyer; Joanne Johnson; Linda Hardy; Tanya Gehrke; Kriengsak Panuwatwanich
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  The effect of a transforming care initiative on patient outcomes in acute surgical units: a time series study.

Authors:  Sarah Burston; Wendy Chaboyer; Brigid Gillespie; Roxanne Carroll
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Building information for systematic improvement of the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers with statistical process control charts and regression.

Authors:  William V Padula; Manish K Mishra; Christopher D Weaver; Taygan Yilmaz; Mark E Splaine
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Choose your tool wisely: u charts are more informative than run charts with or without tests of significance. A comment on Unbeck et al. (2014), Unbeck et al. (2013) and Kottner (2014).

Authors:  Michael Simon; Peter Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Measuring hospital-acquired pressure injuries: A surveillance programme for monitoring performance improvement and estimating annual prevalence.

Authors:  Andrew Jull; Elaine McCall; Matt Chappell; Sam Tobin
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 7.  Systematic review of the use of Statistical Process Control methods to measure the success of pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Clark; Trudie Young; Maureen Fallon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Using statistical process control for monitoring the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Ruud Halfens
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Paul G Shekelle; Jodi L Liu; Margie Sherwood Danz; Robbie Foy; Yee-Wei Lim; Aneesa Motala; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Facility versus unit level reporting of quality indicators in nursing homes when performance monitoring is the goal.

Authors:  Peter G Norton; Michael Murray; Malcolm B Doupe; Greta G Cummings; Jeff W Poss; Janet E Squires; Gary F Teare; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the use of Statistical Process Control methods to measure the success of pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Clark; Trudie Young; Maureen Fallon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  The Contribution of Variable Control Charts to Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Line Slyngstad
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2021-09-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.