Elin Cederkrantz1, Håkan Andersson2, Peter Bernhardt1, Tom Bäck1, Ragnar Hultborn2, Lars Jacobsson1, Holger Jensen3, Sture Lindegren1, Michael Ljungberg4, Tobias Magnander1, Stig Palm1, Per Albertsson5. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2. Department of Oncology, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. PET and Cyclotron Unit, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 5. Department of Oncology, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: per.albertsson@oncology.gu.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage with dissemination in the peritoneal cavity. Most patients achieve clinical remission after surgery and chemotherapy, but approximately 70% eventually experience recurrence, usually in the peritoneal cavity. To prevent recurrence, intraperitoneal (i.p.) targeted α therapy has been proposed as an adjuvant treatment for minimal residual disease after successful primary treatment. In the present study, we calculated absorbed and relative biological effect (RBE)-weighted (equivalent) doses in relevant normal tissues and estimated the effective dose associated with i.p. administration of (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients in clinical remission after salvage chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence of ovarian cancer underwent i.p. infusion of (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2. Potassium perchlorate was given to block unwanted accumulation of (211)At in thyroid and other NIS-containing tissues. Mean absorbed doses to normal tissues were calculated from clinical data, including blood and i.p. fluid samples, urine, γ-camera images, and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images. Extrapolation of preclinical biodistribution data combined with clinical blood activity data allowed us to estimate absorbed doses in additional tissues. The equivalent dose was calculated using an RBE of 5 and the effective dose using the recommended weight factor of 20. All doses were normalized to the initial activity concentration of the infused therapy solution. RESULTS: The urinary bladder, thyroid, and kidneys (1.9, 1.8, and 1.7 mGy per MBq/L) received the 3 highest estimated absorbed doses. When the tissue-weighting factors were applied, the largest contributors to the effective dose were the lungs, stomach, and urinary bladder. Using 100 MBq/L, organ equivalent doses were less than 10% of the estimated tolerance dose. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2 treatment is potentially a well-tolerated therapy for locally confined microscopic ovarian cancer. Absorbed doses to normal organs are low, but because the effective dose potentially corresponds to a risk of treatment-induced carcinogenesis, optimization may still be valuable.
PURPOSE:Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage with dissemination in the peritoneal cavity. Most patients achieve clinical remission after surgery and chemotherapy, but approximately 70% eventually experience recurrence, usually in the peritoneal cavity. To prevent recurrence, intraperitoneal (i.p.) targeted α therapy has been proposed as an adjuvant treatment for minimal residual disease after successful primary treatment. In the present study, we calculated absorbed and relative biological effect (RBE)-weighted (equivalent) doses in relevant normal tissues and estimated the effective dose associated with i.p. administration of (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients in clinical remission after salvage chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence of ovarian cancer underwent i.p. infusion of (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2. Potassium perchlorate was given to block unwanted accumulation of (211)At in thyroid and other NIS-containing tissues. Mean absorbed doses to normal tissues were calculated from clinical data, including blood and i.p. fluid samples, urine, γ-camera images, and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images. Extrapolation of preclinical biodistribution data combined with clinical blood activity data allowed us to estimate absorbed doses in additional tissues. The equivalent dose was calculated using an RBE of 5 and the effective dose using the recommended weight factor of 20. All doses were normalized to the initial activity concentration of the infused therapy solution. RESULTS: The urinary bladder, thyroid, and kidneys (1.9, 1.8, and 1.7 mGy per MBq/L) received the 3 highest estimated absorbed doses. When the tissue-weighting factors were applied, the largest contributors to the effective dose were the lungs, stomach, and urinary bladder. Using 100 MBq/L, organ equivalent doses were less than 10% of the estimated tolerance dose. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2 treatment is potentially a well-tolerated therapy for locally confined microscopic ovarian cancer. Absorbed doses to normal organs are low, but because the effective dose potentially corresponds to a risk of treatment-induced carcinogenesis, optimization may still be valuable.
Authors: Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Oscar R Pozzi; Jaeyeon Choi; Xiao-Guang Zhao; Shawn Murphy; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Mehran Makvandi; Edouard Dupis; Jonathan W Engle; F Meiring Nortier; Michael E Fassbender; Sam Simon; Eva R Birnbaum; Robert W Atcher; Kevin D John; Olivier Rixe; Jeffrey P Norenberg Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Milan Grkovski; Shakeel Modak; Pat B Zanzonico; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven M Larson; John L Humm; Neeta Pandit-Taskar Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Andreas Hallqvist; Karin Bergmark; Tom Bäck; Håkan Andersson; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler; Mia Johansson; Sture Lindegren; Holger Jensen; Lars Jacobsson; Ragnar Hultborn; Stig Palm; Per Albertsson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael E Autenrieth; Christof Seidl; Frank Bruchertseifer; Thomas Horn; Florian Kurtz; Benedikt Feuerecker; Calogero D'Alessandria; Christian Pfob; Stephan Nekolla; Christos Apostolidis; Saed Mirzadeh; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Klemens Scheidhauer; Alfred Morgenstern Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Shakeel Modak; Pat Zanzonico; Milan Grkovski; Emily K Slotkin; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Irene Y Cheung; Todd Heaton; Michael P LaQuaglia; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Neeta Pandit-Taskar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anna Gustafsson-Lutz; Tom Bäck; Emma Aneheim; Ragnar Hultborn; Stig Palm; Lars Jacobsson; Alfred Morgenstern; Frank Bruchertseifer; Per Albertsson; Sture Lindegren Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.138