Andreas Hallqvist1, Karin Bergmark1, Tom Bäck2, Håkan Andersson1, Pernilla Dahm-Kähler3, Mia Johansson1, Sture Lindegren2, Holger Jensen4, Lars Jacobsson2, Ragnar Hultborn1, Stig Palm2, Per Albertsson5. 1. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; and. 4. PET and Cyclotron Unit, KF-3982, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden per.albertsson@oncology.gu.se.
Abstract
Eliminating microscopic residual disease with α-particle radiation is theoretically appealing. After extensive preclinical work with α-particle-emitting 211At, we performed a phase I trial with intraperitoneal α-particle therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer using 211At conjugated to MX35, the antigen-binding fragments-F(ab')2-of a mouse monoclonal antibody. We now present clinical outcome data and toxicity in a long-term follow-up with individual absorbed dose estimations. Methods: Twelve patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer, achieving a second complete or nearly complete response with chemotherapy, received intraperitoneal treatment with escalating (20-215 MBq/L) activity concentrations of 211At-MX35 F(ab')2. Results: The activity concentration was escalated to 215 MBq/L without any dose-limiting toxicities. Most toxicities were low-grade and likely related to the treatment procedure, not clearly linked to the α-particle irradiation, with no observed hematologic toxicity. One grade 3 fatigue and 1 grade 4 intestinal perforation during catheter implantation were observed. Four patients had a survival of more than 6 y, one of whom did not relapse. At progression, chemotherapy was given without signs of reduced tolerability. Overall median survival was 35 mo, with a 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-y survival of 100%, 83%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Calculations of the absorbed doses showed that a lower specific activity is associated with a lower single-cell dose, whereas a high specific activity may result in a lower central dose in microtumors. Individual differences in absorbed dose to possible microtumors were due to variations in administered activity and the specific activity. Conclusion: No apparent signs of radiation-induced toxicity or decreased tolerance to relapse therapy were observed. The dosimetric calculations show that further optimization is advisable to increase the efficacy and reduce possible long-term toxicity.
Eliminating microscopic residual disease with α-particle radiation is theoretically appealing. After extensive preclinical work with α-particle-emitting 211At, we performed a phase I trial with intraperitoneal α-particle therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer using 211At conjugated to MX35, the antigen-binding fragments-F(ab')2-of a mouse monoclonal antibody. We now present clinical outcome data and toxicity in a long-term follow-up with individual absorbed dose estimations. Methods: Twelve patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer, achieving a second complete or nearly complete response with chemotherapy, received intraperitoneal treatment with escalating (20-215 MBq/L) activity concentrations of 211At-MX35 F(ab')2. Results: The activity concentration was escalated to 215 MBq/L without any dose-limiting toxicities. Most toxicities were low-grade and likely related to the treatment procedure, not clearly linked to the α-particle irradiation, with no observed hematologic toxicity. One grade 3 fatigue and 1 grade 4 intestinal perforation during catheter implantation were observed. Four patients had a survival of more than 6 y, one of whom did not relapse. At progression, chemotherapy was given without signs of reduced tolerability. Overall median survival was 35 mo, with a 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-y survival of 100%, 83%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Calculations of the absorbed doses showed that a lower specific activity is associated with a lower single-cell dose, whereas a high specific activity may result in a lower central dose in microtumors. Individual differences in absorbed dose to possible microtumors were due to variations in administered activity and the specific activity. Conclusion: No apparent signs of radiation-induced toxicity or decreased tolerance to relapse therapy were observed. The dosimetric calculations show that further optimization is advisable to increase the efficacy and reduce possible long-term toxicity.
Authors: Angèle L Oei; René H Verheijen; Michael V Seiden; Benedict B Benigno; Alberto Lopes; John T Soper; Agamemnon A Epenetos; Leon F Massuger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ritu Salani; Floor J Backes; Michael Fung Kee Fung; Christine H Holschneider; Lynn P Parker; Robert E Bristow; Barbara A Goff Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Michelle L Harrison; Martin E Gore; David Spriggs; Stan Kaye; Alexia Iasonos; Martee Hensley; Carol Aghajanian; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Paul Sabbatini Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ruby Meredith; Zhiying You; Ronald Alvarez; Edward Partridge; William Grizzle; Albert LoBuglio Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: René H Verheijen; Leon F Massuger; Benedict B Benigno; Agamemnon A Epenetos; Alberto Lopes; John T Soper; Janica Markowska; Rostislav Vyzula; Tom Jobling; Gordon Stamp; Gregory Spiegel; Dennis Thurston; Theo Falke; Joanna Lambert; Michael V Seiden Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vandana Batra; Minu Samanta; Mehran Makvandi; David Groff; Paul Martorano; Jimmy Elias; Pietro Ranieri; Matthew Tsang; Catherine Hou; Yimei Li; Bruce Pawel; Daniel Martinez; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Sean Carlin; Daniel A Pryma; John M Maris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Milan Grkovski; Shakeel Modak; Pat B Zanzonico; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven M Larson; John L Humm; Neeta Pandit-Taskar Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Shakeel Modak; Pat Zanzonico; Milan Grkovski; Emily K Slotkin; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Irene Y Cheung; Todd Heaton; Michael P LaQuaglia; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Neeta Pandit-Taskar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 44.544