Heather M Conklin1, Robert J Ogg2, Jason M Ashford2, Matthew A Scoggins2, Ping Zou2, Kellie N Clark2, Karen Martin-Elbahesh2, Kristina K Hardy2, Thomas E Merchant2, Sima Jeha2, Lu Huang2, Hui Zhang2. 1. Heather M. Conklin, Robert J. Ogg, Jason M. Ashford, Matthew A. Scoggins, Ping Zou, Kellie N. Clark, Karen Martin-Elbahesh, Thomas E. Merchant, Sima Jeha, Lu Huang, and Hui Zhang, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Kristina K. Hardy, Children's National Medical Center and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. heather.conklin@stjude.org. 2. Heather M. Conklin, Robert J. Ogg, Jason M. Ashford, Matthew A. Scoggins, Ping Zou, Kellie N. Clark, Karen Martin-Elbahesh, Thomas E. Merchant, Sima Jeha, Lu Huang, and Hui Zhang, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Kristina K. Hardy, Children's National Medical Center and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Children receivingCNS-directed therapy for cancer are at risk for cognitive problems, with few available empirically supported interventions. Cognitive problems indicate neurodevelopmental disruption that may be modifiable with intervention. This study evaluated short-term efficacy of a computerized cognitive training program and neural correlates of cognitive change. PATIENT AND METHODS: A total of 68 survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or brain tumor (BT) with identified cognitive deficits were randomly assigned to computerized cognitive intervention (male, n = 18; female, n = 16; ALL, n = 23; BT, n = 11; mean age ± standard deviation, 12.21 ± 2.47 years) or waitlist (male, n = 18; female, n = 16; ALL, n = 24; BT, n = 10; median age ± standard deviation, 11.82 ± 2.42 years). Intervention participants were asked to complete 25 training sessions at home with weekly, telephone-based coaching. Cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging scans (intervention group) were completed pre- and postintervention, with immediate change in spatial span backward as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Survivors completing the intervention (n = 30; 88%) demonstrated greater improvement than controls on measures of working memory (mean ± SEM; eg, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children [fourth edition; WISC-IV] spatial span backward, 3.13 ± 0.58 v 0.75 ± 0.43; P = .002; effect size [ES], 0.84), attention (eg, WISC-IV spatial span forward, 3.30 ± 0.71 v 1.25 ± 0.39; P = .01; ES, 0.65), and processing speed (eg, Conners' Continuous Performance Test hit reaction time, -2.10 ± 1.47 v 2.54 ± 1.25; P = .02; ES, .61) and showed greater reductions in reported executive dysfunction (eg, Conners' Parent Rating Scale III, -6.73 ± 1.51 v 0.41 ± 1.53; P = .002; ES, 0.84). Functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant pre- to post-training reduction in activation of left lateral prefrontal and bilateral medial frontal areas. CONCLUSION: Study findings show computerized cognitive training is feasible and efficacious for childhood cancer survivors, with evidence for training-related neuroplasticity.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Children receiving CNS-directed therapy for cancer are at risk for cognitive problems, with few available empirically supported interventions. Cognitive problems indicate neurodevelopmental disruption that may be modifiable with intervention. This study evaluated short-term efficacy of a computerized cognitive training program and neural correlates of cognitive change. PATIENT AND METHODS: A total of 68 survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or brain tumor (BT) with identified cognitive deficits were randomly assigned to computerized cognitive intervention (male, n = 18; female, n = 16; ALL, n = 23; BT, n = 11; mean age ± standard deviation, 12.21 ± 2.47 years) or waitlist (male, n = 18; female, n = 16; ALL, n = 24; BT, n = 10; median age ± standard deviation, 11.82 ± 2.42 years). Intervention participants were asked to complete 25 training sessions at home with weekly, telephone-based coaching. Cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging scans (intervention group) were completed pre- and postintervention, with immediate change in spatial span backward as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Survivors completing the intervention (n = 30; 88%) demonstrated greater improvement than controls on measures of working memory (mean ± SEM; eg, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children [fourth edition; WISC-IV] spatial span backward, 3.13 ± 0.58 v 0.75 ± 0.43; P = .002; effect size [ES], 0.84), attention (eg, WISC-IV spatial span forward, 3.30 ± 0.71 v 1.25 ± 0.39; P = .01; ES, 0.65), and processing speed (eg, Conners' Continuous Performance Test hit reaction time, -2.10 ± 1.47 v 2.54 ± 1.25; P = .02; ES, .61) and showed greater reductions in reported executive dysfunction (eg, Conners' Parent Rating Scale III, -6.73 ± 1.51 v 0.41 ± 1.53; P = .002; ES, 0.84). Functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant pre- to post-training reduction in activation of left lateral prefrontal and bilateral medial frontal areas. CONCLUSION: Study findings show computerized cognitive training is feasible and efficacious for childhood cancer survivors, with evidence for training-related neuroplasticity.
Authors: Raymond K Mulhern; Holly A White; John O Glass; Larry E Kun; Laurie Leigh; Stephen J Thompson; Wilburn E Reddick Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Derek Evan Nee; Joshua W Brown; Mary K Askren; Marc G Berman; Emre Demiralp; Adam Krawitz; John Jonides Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Heather M Conklin; Raja B Khan; Wilburn E Reddick; Susan Helton; Ronald Brown; Scott C Howard; Melanie Bonner; Robbin Christensen; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Raymond K Mulhern Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2007-06-14
Authors: Robert W Butler; Donna R Copeland; Diane L Fairclough; Raymond K Mulhern; Ernest R Katz; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Sunita K Patel; Olle Jane Z Sahler Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-06
Authors: Lisa M Jacola; Kim Edelstein; Wei Liu; Ching-Hon Pui; Robert Hayashi; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Deokumar Srivastava; Tara Henderson; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Sarah L Jennewein; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Damon R Reed; Brent J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jin-Shei Lai; Corey Bregman; Frank Zelko; Cindy Nowinski; David Cella; Jennifer J Beaumont; Stewart Goldman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Michal Zapotocky; Kiran Beera; Jenny Adamski; Normand Laperierre; Sharon Guger; Laura Janzen; Alvaro Lassaletta; Liana Figueiredo Nobre; Ute Bartels; Uri Tabori; Cynthia Hawkins; Stacey Urbach; Derek S Tsang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Eric Bouffet; Donald J Mabbott; Vijay Ramaswamy Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Fiona Schulte; Tara M Brinkman; Chenghong Li; Taryn Fay-McClymont; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Kirsten K Ness; Rebecca M Howell; Sabine Mueller; Elizabeth Wells; Douglas Strother; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Heather M Conklin; Jason M Ashford; Kellie N Clark; Karen Martin-Elbahesh; Kristina K Hardy; Thomas E Merchant; Robert J Ogg; Sima Jeha; Lu Huang; Hui Zhang Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2017-03-01
Authors: Ashley S Fournier-Goodnight; Jason M Ashford; Kellie N Clark; Karen Martin-Elbahesh; Kristina K Hardy; Thomas E Merchant; Sima Jeha; Robert J Ogg; Hui Zhang; Lei Wang; Heather M Conklin Journal: Appl Neuropsychol Child Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 1.493
Authors: Heather M Conklin; Kirsten K Ness; Jason M Ashford; Matthew A Scoggins; Robert J Ogg; Yuanyuan Han; Yimei Li; Julie A Bradley; Frederick A Boop; Thomas E Merchant Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.892