BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of social difficulties in adolescent survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. METHODS: Six hundred sixty-five survivors of CNS tumors (53.8% male and 51.7% treated with cranial radiation therapy [CRT]), who had a current median age of 15.0 years (range, 2.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 12.1 years (range, 8.0-17.7 years) from their diagnosis, were compared with 1376 survivors of solid tumors (50.4% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 13.2 years (range, 8.3-17.9 years) from their diagnosis, and 726 siblings (52.2% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years). Social adjustment was measured with parent-proxy responses to the Behavior Problems Index. Latent profile analysis defined social classes. Multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and age at diagnosis, identified predictors of class membership. Path analyses tested mediating effects of physical limitations, sensory loss, and cognitive impairment on social outcomes. RESULTS: Caregivers reported that survivors of CNS tumors were more likely to have 0 friends (15.3%) and to interact with friends less than once per week (41.0%) in comparison with survivors of solid tumors (2.9% and 13.6%, respectively) and siblings (2.3% and 8.7%, respectively). Latent profile analysis identified 3 social classes for survivors of CNS tumors: well-adjusted (53.4%), social deficits (16.2%), and poor peer relationships (30.4%). However, 2 classes were identified for survivors of solid tumors and siblings: well-adjusted (86.2% and 91.1%, respectively) and social deficits (13.8% and 8.9%, respectively). CRT predicted class membership for CNS survivors (odds ratio [OR] for poor peer relationships, 1.16/10 Gy; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.25; OR for social deficits 1.14/10 Gy; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; reference, well-adjusted). Cognitive impairment mediated the association between all social outcomes and CRT (P values < .001). CONCLUSION: Almost 50% of survivors of CNS tumors experience social difficulties; the pattern is unique in comparison with solid tumor and sibling groups. Cognitive impairment is associated with increased risk, and this highlights the need for multitargeted interventions.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of social difficulties in adolescent survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. METHODS: Six hundred sixty-five survivors of CNS tumors (53.8% male and 51.7% treated with cranial radiation therapy [CRT]), who had a current median age of 15.0 years (range, 2.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 12.1 years (range, 8.0-17.7 years) from their diagnosis, were compared with 1376 survivors of solid tumors (50.4% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years) and were a median of 13.2 years (range, 8.3-17.9 years) from their diagnosis, and 726 siblings (52.2% male), who had a median age of 15.0 years (range, 12.0-17.0 years). Social adjustment was measured with parent-proxy responses to the Behavior Problems Index. Latent profile analysis defined social classes. Multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and age at diagnosis, identified predictors of class membership. Path analyses tested mediating effects of physical limitations, sensory loss, and cognitive impairment on social outcomes. RESULTS: Caregivers reported that survivors of CNS tumors were more likely to have 0 friends (15.3%) and to interact with friends less than once per week (41.0%) in comparison with survivors of solid tumors (2.9% and 13.6%, respectively) and siblings (2.3% and 8.7%, respectively). Latent profile analysis identified 3 social classes for survivors of CNS tumors: well-adjusted (53.4%), social deficits (16.2%), and poor peer relationships (30.4%). However, 2 classes were identified for survivors of solid tumors and siblings: well-adjusted (86.2% and 91.1%, respectively) and social deficits (13.8% and 8.9%, respectively). CRT predicted class membership for CNS survivors (odds ratio [OR] for poor peer relationships, 1.16/10 Gy; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.25; OR for social deficits 1.14/10 Gy; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; reference, well-adjusted). Cognitive impairment mediated the association between all social outcomes and CRT (P values < .001). CONCLUSION: Almost 50% of survivors of CNS tumors experience social difficulties; the pattern is unique in comparison with solid tumor and sibling groups. Cognitive impairment is associated with increased risk, and this highlights the need for multitargeted interventions.
Authors: Kirsten K Ness; E Brannon Morris; Vikki G Nolan; Carrie R Howell; Laura S Gilchrist; Marilyn Stovall; Cheryl L Cox; James L Klosky; Amar Gajjar; Joseph P Neglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katherine H Moyer; Victoria W Willard; Alan M Gross; Kelli L Netson; Jason M Ashford; Lisa S Kahalley; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Heather M Conklin Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Robert W Butler; Olle Jane Z Sahler; Martha A Askins; Melissa A Alderfer; Ernest R Katz; Sean Phipps; Robert B Noll Journal: Dev Disabil Res Rev Date: 2008
Authors: Keith Owen Yeates; Erika Swift; H Gerry Taylor; Shari L Wade; Dennis Drotar; Terry Stancin; Nori Minich Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; John D Boice; Norman E Breslow; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Frederic P Li; Anna T Meadows; John J Mulvihill; Joseph P Neglia; Mark E Nesbit; Roger J Packer; John D Potter; Charles A Sklar; Malcolm A Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: Med Pediatr Oncol Date: 2002-04
Authors: Matthew C Hocking; Julia Parish-Morris; Robert T Schultz; Jane E Minturn; Cole Brodsky; Emily K Shabason; John D Herrington Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Bree R Eaton; Saveli Goldberg; Nancy J Tarbell; Miranda P Lawell; Sara L Gallotto; Elizabeth A Weyman; Karen A Kuhlthau; David H Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Torunn I Yock Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Fiona Schulte; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Barbara A Olson-Bullis; Pia Banerjee; Matthew C Hocking; Laura Janzen; Lisa S Kahalley; Hayley Wroot; Caitlin Forbes; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tiina M Remes; Emma Hovén; Niina Ritari; Heli Pohjasniemi; Riina Puosi; Pekka M Arikoski; Mikko O Arola; Päivi M Lähteenmäki; Tuula R I Lönnqvist; Marja K Ojaniemi; V Pekka Riikonen; Kirsti H Sirkiä; Satu Winqvist; Heikki M J Rantala; Marika Harila; Arja H Harila-Saari Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-01-22