Literature DB >> 16079245

Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent.

Seema Sayala1, Joseph B Sala, Susan M Courtney.   

Abstract

Unlike tasks in which practice leads to an automatic stimulus-response association, it is thought working memory (WM) tasks continue to require cognitive control processes after repeated performance. Previous studies investigating WM task repetition are in accord with this. However, it is unclear whether changes in neural activity after repetition imply alterations in general control processes common to all WM tasks or are specific to the selection, encoding and maintenance of the relevant information. In the present study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine changes during sample, delay and test periods during repetition of both object and spatial delayed recognition tasks. We found decreases in fMRI activation in both spatial and object-selective areas after spatial WM task repetition, independent of behavioral performance. Few areas showed changed activity after object WM task repetition. These results indicate that spatial task repetition leads to increased efficiency of maintaining task-relevant information and improved ability to filter out task-irrelevant information. The specificity of this repetition effect to the spatial task suggests a difference exists in the nature of the representation of object and spatial information and that their maintenance in WM is likely subserved by different neural systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079245     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  33 in total

1.  Functional brain connectivity at rest changes after working memory training.

Authors:  Dietsje D Jolles; Mark A van Buchem; Eveline A Crone; Serge A R B Rombouts
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Neuronal effects following working memory training.

Authors:  Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi; John Jonides
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  II. Temporal patterns of longitudinal change in aging brain function.

Authors:  L L Beason-Held; M A Kraut; S M Resnick
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  I. Longitudinal changes in aging brain function.

Authors:  L L Beason-Held; M A Kraut; S M Resnick
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Regional specificity and practice: dynamic changes in object and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Susan M Landau; Hugh Garavan; Eric H Schumacher; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Changes in prefrontal neuronal activity after learning to perform a spatial working memory task.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Qi; Travis Meyer; Terrence R Stanford; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cholinergic enhancement eliminates modulation of neural activity by task difficulty in the prefrontal cortex during working memory.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Emiliano Ricciardi; Mark B Schapiro; Stanley I Rapoport; Pietro Pietrini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Stage effects of negative emotion on spatial and verbal working memory.

Authors:  Xuebing Li; Raymond Ck Chan; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Cognitive control in auditory working memory is enhanced in musicians.

Authors:  Karen Johanne Pallesen; Elvira Brattico; Christopher J Bailey; Antti Korvenoja; Juha Koivisto; Albert Gjedde; Synnöve Carlson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural correlates of learning to attend.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.