Literature DB >> 26460164

Implementation and assessment of a yeast orphan gene research project: involving undergraduates in authentic research experiences and progressing our understanding of uncharacterized open reading frames.

Bethany V Bowling1, Patrick J Schultheis1, Erin D Strome1.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the first eukaryotic organism to be sequenced; however, little progress has been made in recent years in furthering our understanding of all open reading frames (ORFs). From October 2012 to May 2015 the number of verified ORFs had only risen from 75.31% to 78%, while the number of uncharacterized ORFs had decreased from 12.8% to 11% (representing > 700 genes still left in this category; http://www.yeastgenome.org/genomesnapshot). Course-based research has been shown to increase student learning while providing experience with real scientific investigation; however, implementation in large, multi-section courses presents many challenges. This study sought to test the feasibility and effectiveness of incorporating authentic research into a core genetics course, with multiple instructors, to increase student learning and progress our understanding of uncharacterized ORFs. We generated a module-based annotation toolkit and utilized easily accessible bioinformatics tools to predict gene function for uncharacterized ORFs within the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD). Students were each assigned an uncharacterized ORF, which they annotated using contemporary comparative genomics methodologies, including multiple sequence alignment, conserved domain identification, signal peptide prediction and cellular localization algorithms. Student learning outcomes were measured by quizzes, project reports and presentations, as well as a post-project questionnaire. Our results indicate that the authentic research experience had positive impacts on students' perception of their learning and their confidence to conduct future research. Furthermore, we believe that creation of an online repository and adoption and/or adaptation of this project across multiple researchers and institutions could speed the process of gene function prediction.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinformatics; course-based research; genetics; orphan genes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26460164      PMCID: PMC4738069          DOI: 10.1002/yea.3139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  22 in total

1.  STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Authors:  Jane G Stout; Nilanjana Dasgupta; Matthew Hunsinger; Melissa A McManus
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-02

2.  Can an inquiry approach improve college student learning in a teaching laboratory?

Authors:  Steven W Rissing; John G Cogan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Using a molecular-genetic approach to investigate bacterial physiology in a continuous, research-based, semester-long laboratory for undergraduates.

Authors:  Jeremiah Foster Ault; Betsey Marie Renfro; Andrea Kirsten White
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2011-12-01

4.  Functional genomics analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae iron responsive transcription factor Aft1 reveals iron-independent functions.

Authors:  Sharon Berthelet; Jane Usher; Kristian Shulist; Akil Hamza; Nancy Maltez; Anne Johnston; Ying Fong; Linda J Harris; Kristin Baetz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Using microbial genome annotation as a foundation for collaborative student research.

Authors:  Kelynne E Reed; John M Richardson
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.160

6.  Integrating grant-funded research into the undergraduate biology curriculum using IMG-ACT.

Authors:  Jayna L Ditty; Kayla M Williams; Megan M Keller; Grischa Y Chen; Xianxian Liu; Rebecca E Parales
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.160

7.  The genomics education partnership: successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions.

Authors:  Christopher D Shaffer; Consuelo Alvarez; Cheryl Bailey; Daron Barnard; Satish Bhalla; Chitra Chandrasekaran; Vidya Chandrasekaran; Hui-Min Chung; Douglas R Dorer; Chunguang Du; Todd T Eckdahl; Jeff L Poet; Donald Frohlich; Anya L Goodman; Yuying Gosser; Charles Hauser; Laura L M Hoopes; Diana Johnson; Christopher J Jones; Marian Kaehler; Nighat Kokan; Olga R Kopp; Gary A Kuleck; Gerard McNeil; Robert Moss; Jennifer L Myka; Alexis Nagengast; Robert Morris; Paul J Overvoorde; Elizabeth Shoop; Susan Parrish; Kelynne Reed; E Gloria Regisford; Dennis Revie; Anne G Rosenwald; Ken Saville; Stephanie Schroeder; Mary Shaw; Gary Skuse; Christopher Smith; Mary Smith; Eric P Spana; Mary Spratt; Joyce Stamm; Jeff S Thompson; Matthew Wawersik; Barbara A Wilson; Jim Youngblom; Wilson Leung; Jeremy Buhler; Elaine R Mardis; David Lopatto; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education.

Authors:  Matthew J Kloser; Sara E Brownell; Nona R Chiariello; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship model.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wei; Terry Woodin
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data.

Authors:  Sara E Brownell; Daria S Hekmat-Scafe; Veena Singla; Patricia Chandler Seawell; Jamie F Conklin Imam; Sarah L Eddy; Tim Stearns; Martha S Cyert
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  3 in total

1.  Connecting research and teaching introductory cell and molecular biology using an Arabidopsis mutant screen.

Authors:  Jinjie Liu; Ron Cook; Linda Danhof; David Lopatto; Jon R Stoltzfus; Christoph Benning
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.369

2.  The Impact of a Semester-Long, Cell Culture and Fluorescence Microscopy CURE on Learning and Attitudes in an Underrepresented STEM Student Population.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurst-Kennedy; Michael Saum; Cindy Achat-Mendes; Allison D'Costa; Elisabeth Javazon; Shoshana Katzman; Ernest Ricks; Alessandra Barrera
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-04-10

3.  Using Metabolic Engineering to Connect Molecular Biology Techniques to Societal Challenges.

Authors:  Claire L Gordy; Carlos C Goller
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.