Literature DB >> 21142376

STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Jane G Stout1, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Matthew Hunsinger, Melissa A McManus.   

Abstract

Three studies tested a stereotype inoculation model, which proposed that contact with same-sex experts (advanced peers, professionals, professors) in academic environments involving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enhances women's self-concept in STEM, attitudes toward STEM, and motivation to pursue STEM careers. Two cross-sectional controlled experiments and 1 longitudinal naturalistic study in a calculus class revealed that exposure to female STEM experts promoted positive implicit attitudes and stronger implicit identification with STEM (Studies 1-3), greater self-efficacy in STEM (Study 3), and more effort on STEM tests (Study 1). Studies 2 and 3 suggested that the benefit of seeing same-sex experts is driven by greater subjective identification and connectedness with these individuals, which in turn predicts enhanced self-efficacy, domain identification, and commitment to pursue STEM careers. Importantly, women's own self-concept benefited from contact with female experts even though negative stereotypes about their gender and STEM remained active. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21142376     DOI: 10.1037/a0021385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  61 in total

1.  Shifting STEM Stereotypes? Considering the Role of Peer and Teacher Gender.

Authors:  Catherine Riegle-Crumb; Chelsea Moore; Jenny Buontempo
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2016-10-12

2.  Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering.

Authors:  Nilanjana Dasgupta; Melissa McManus Scircle; Matthew Hunsinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering.

Authors:  Tara C Dennehy; Nilanjana Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India.

Authors:  Lori Beaman; Esther Duflo; Rohini Pande; Petia Topalova
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Implementation and assessment of a yeast orphan gene research project: involving undergraduates in authentic research experiences and progressing our understanding of uncharacterized open reading frames.

Authors:  Bethany V Bowling; Patrick J Schultheis; Erin D Strome
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors.

Authors:  Catherine Riegle-Crumb; Barbara King; Chelsea Moore
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2016-01-30

8.  Oppositional identities: dissimilarities in how women and men experience parent versus professional roles.

Authors:  Allegra J Hodges; Bernadette Park
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-05-27

9.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  STEM Education.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Michael Fang; Kimberlee Shauman
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2015-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.