Literature DB >> 19255136

Can an inquiry approach improve college student learning in a teaching laboratory?

Steven W Rissing1, John G Cogan.   

Abstract

We present an inquiry-based, hands-on laboratory exercise on enzyme activity for an introductory college biology course for science majors. We measure student performance on a series of objective and subjective questions before and after completion of this exercise; we also measure performance of a similar cohort of students before and after completion of an existing, standard, "direct" exercise over the same topics. Although student performance on these questions increased significantly after completion of the inquiry exercise, it did not increase after completion of the control, standard exercise. Pressure to "cover" many complex topics as preparation for high-stakes examinations such as the Medical College Admissions Test may account for persistence of highly efficient, yet dubiously effective "cookbook" laboratory exercises in many science classes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255136      PMCID: PMC2649651          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-05-0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  1 in total

1.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  15 in total

1.  Implementation and assessment of a yeast orphan gene research project: involving undergraduates in authentic research experiences and progressing our understanding of uncharacterized open reading frames.

Authors:  Bethany V Bowling; Patrick J Schultheis; Erin D Strome
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  From genes to proteins to behavior: a laboratory project that enhances student understanding in cell and molecular biology.

Authors:  Benjamin D Aronson; Linda A Silveira
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Implementation of a project-based molecular biology laboratory emphasizing protein structure-function relationships in a large introductory biology laboratory course.

Authors:  Daniel J Treacy; Saumya M Sankaran; Susannah Gordon-Messer; Danielle Saly; Rebecca Miller; Stefan R Isaac; Melissa S Kosinski-Collins
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Effects of collaborative group composition and inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and achievement in undergraduate biology.

Authors:  Jamie Lee Jensen; Anton Lawson
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education.

Authors:  Matthew J Kloser; Sara E Brownell; Nona R Chiariello; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Investigating the effects of exam length on performance and cognitive fatigue.

Authors:  Jamie L Jensen; Dane A Berry; Tyler A Kummer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inquiry-based training improves teaching effectiveness of biology teaching assistants.

Authors:  P William Hughes; Michelle R Ellefson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterizing Mystery Cell Lines: Student-driven Research Projects in an Undergraduate Neuroscience Laboratory Course.

Authors:  Michele L Lemons
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2012-03-15

9.  Electroretinograms in Drosophila: a robust and genetically accessible electrophysiological system for the undergraduate laboratory.

Authors:  Ilya Vilinsky; Karl G Johnson
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2012-10-15

10.  Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: a science skills approach to instruction and assessment.

Authors:  Elisa M Stone
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.