Nichola C Garbett1, Guy N Brock2. 1. James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: nichola.garbett@louisville.edu. 2. Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: guy.brock@louisville.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a tool for measuring the thermal stability profiles of complex molecular interactions in biological fluids. DSC profiles (thermograms) of biofluids provide specific signatures which are being utilized as a new diagnostic approach for characterizing disease but the development of these approaches is still in its infancy. METHODS: This article evaluates several approaches for the analysis of thermograms which could increase the utility of DSC for clinical application. Thermograms were analyzed using localized thermogram features and principal components (PCs). The performance of these methods was evaluated alongside six models for the classification of a data set comprised of 300 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 300 control subjects obtained from the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR). RESULTS: Classification performance was substantially higher using the penalized algorithms relative to localized features/PCs alone. The models were grouped into two sets, the first having smoother solution vectors but lower classification accuracies than the second with seemingly noisier solution vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Coupling thermogram technology with modern classification algorithms provides a powerful diagnostic approach for analysis of biological samples. The solution vectors from the models may reflect important information from the thermogram profiles for discriminating between clinical groups. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: DSC thermograms show sensitivity to changes in the bulk plasma proteome that correlate with clinical status. To move this technology towards clinical application the development of new approaches is needed to extract discriminatory parameters from DSC profiles for the comparison and diagnostic classification of patients.
BACKGROUND: Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a tool for measuring the thermal stability profiles of complex molecular interactions in biological fluids. DSC profiles (thermograms) of biofluids provide specific signatures which are being utilized as a new diagnostic approach for characterizing disease but the development of these approaches is still in its infancy. METHODS: This article evaluates several approaches for the analysis of thermograms which could increase the utility of DSC for clinical application. Thermograms were analyzed using localized thermogram features and principal components (PCs). The performance of these methods was evaluated alongside six models for the classification of a data set comprised of 300 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 300 control subjects obtained from the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR). RESULTS: Classification performance was substantially higher using the penalized algorithms relative to localized features/PCs alone. The models were grouped into two sets, the first having smoother solution vectors but lower classification accuracies than the second with seemingly noisier solution vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Coupling thermogram technology with modern classification algorithms provides a powerful diagnostic approach for analysis of biological samples. The solution vectors from the models may reflect important information from the thermogram profiles for discriminating between clinical groups. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: DSC thermograms show sensitivity to changes in the bulk plasma proteome that correlate with clinical status. To move this technology towards clinical application the development of new approaches is needed to extract discriminatory parameters from DSC profiles for the comparison and diagnostic classification of patients.
Authors: Nichola C Garbett; James J Miller; A Bennett Jenson; Donald M Miller; Jonathan B Chaires Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Alexis A Chagovetz; Randy L Jensen; Larry Recht; Michael Glantz; Alexander M Chagovetz Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Astrid Rasmussen; Sydney Sevier; Jennifer A Kelly; Stuart B Glenn; Teresa Aberle; Carisa M Cooney; Anya Grether; Ellen James; Jared Ning; Joanne Tesiram; Jean Morrisey; Tiny Powe; Mark Drexel; Wes Daniel; Bahram Namjou; Joshua O Ojwang; Kim L Nguyen; Joshua W Cavett; Jeannie L Te; Judith A James; R Hal Scofield; Kathy Moser; Gary S Gilkeson; Diane L Kamen; Craig W Carson; Ana I Quintero-del-Rio; Maria del Carmen Ballesteros; Marilynn G Punaro; David R Karp; Daniel J Wallace; Michael Weisman; Joan T Merrill; Roberto Rivera; Michelle A Petri; Daniel A Albert; Luis R Espinoza; Tammy O Utset; Timothy S Shaver; Eugene Arthur; Juan-Manuel Anaya; Gail R Bruner; John B Harley Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Alexis A Chagovetz; Colette Quinn; Neil Damarse; Lee D Hansen; Alexander M Chagovetz; Randy L Jensen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Nichola C Garbett; Guy N Brock; Jonathan B Chaires; Chongkham S Mekmaysy; Lynn DeLeeuw; Kathy L Sivils; John B Harley; Brad H Rovin; K B Kulasekera; Wael N Jarjour Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shesh N Rai; Sudhir Srivastava; Jianmin Pan; Xiaoyong Wu; Somesh P Rai; Chongkham S Mekmaysy; Lynn DeLeeuw; Jonathan B Chaires; Nichola C Garbett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sonia Hermoso-Durán; Guillermo García-Rayado; Laura Ceballos-Laita; Carlos Sostres; Sonia Vega; Judith Millastre; Oscar Sánchez-Gracia; Jorge L Ojeda; Ángel Lanas; Adrián Velázquez-Campoy; Olga Abian Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2020-12-31
Authors: Svetla Todinova; Sashka Krumova; Desislava Bogdanova; Avgustina Danailova; Elena Zlatareva; Nikolay Kalaydzhiev; Ariana Langari; Ivan Milanov; Stefka G Taneva Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Francisca Barceló; Rosa Gomila; Ivan de Paul; Xavier Gili; Jaume Segura; Albert Pérez-Montaña; Teresa Jimenez-Marco; Antonia Sampol; José Portugal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauren L Chen; Erik J Zmuda; Maria M Talavera; Jessica Frick; Guy N Brock; Yusen Liu; Mark A Klebanoff; Jennifer K Trittmann Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 3.756