BACKGROUND: Medication errors during hospitalization are a major patient safety concern. Medication reconciliation is an effective tool to reduce medication errors, yet internal medicine residents rarely receive formal education on the process. OBJECTIVE: We assessed if an educational intervention on quality improvement principles and effective medication reconciliation for internal medicine residents will lead to fewer medication discrepancies and more accurate discharge medication lists. METHODS:From July 2012 to May 2013, internal medicine residents from 3 academic institutions who were rotating at the Washington DC VA Medical Center receivedtwice-monthly interactive educational sessions on medication reconciliation, using both institutional summary metrics and data from their own discharges. Sessions were led by a faculty member or chief resident. Accuracy of discharge instructions for residents in the intervention group was compared to the accuracy of discharge data from June 2012 for a group of residents who did not receive the intervention. We used χ(2) analysis to assess for differences. RESULTS: The number of duplicate medications (23% versus 12%, P = .01); extraneous medications (14% versus 6%, P = .014); medications sorted by disease or indication (25% versus 77%, P < .001); and the number of discrepancies in discharge summaries (34% versus 11%, P < .001) statistically improved. No difference in the number of omissions was found between the 2 groups (17% versus 15%, P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention targeting internal medicine residents can be implemented with reasonable staff and time costs, and is effective in reducing the number of medication discrepancies at discharge.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Medication errors during hospitalization are a major patient safety concern. Medication reconciliation is an effective tool to reduce medication errors, yet internal medicine residents rarely receive formal education on the process. OBJECTIVE: We assessed if an educational intervention on quality improvement principles and effective medication reconciliation for internal medicine residents will lead to fewer medication discrepancies and more accurate discharge medication lists. METHODS: From July 2012 to May 2013, internal medicine residents from 3 academic institutions who were rotating at the Washington DC VA Medical Center received twice-monthly interactive educational sessions on medication reconciliation, using both institutional summary metrics and data from their own discharges. Sessions were led by a faculty member or chief resident. Accuracy of discharge instructions for residents in the intervention group was compared to the accuracy of discharge data from June 2012 for a group of residents who did not receive the intervention. We used χ(2) analysis to assess for differences. RESULTS: The number of duplicate medications (23% versus 12%, P = .01); extraneous medications (14% versus 6%, P = .014); medications sorted by disease or indication (25% versus 77%, P < .001); and the number of discrepancies in discharge summaries (34% versus 11%, P < .001) statistically improved. No difference in the number of omissions was found between the 2 groups (17% versus 15%, P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention targeting internal medicine residents can be implemented with reasonable staff and time costs, and is effective in reducing the number of medication discrepancies at discharge.
Authors: Kristine M Gleason; Jennifer M Groszek; Carol Sullivan; Denise Rooney; Cynthia Barnard; Gary A Noskin Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Vincent C Tam; Sandra R Knowles; Patricia L Cornish; Nowell Fine; Romina Marchesano; Edward E Etchells Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Amy Hai Yan Chan; Elizabeth Garratt; Benjamin Lawrence; Nicholas Turnbull; Priya Pratapsingh; Peter N Black Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Patricia L Cornish; Sandra R Knowles; Romina Marchesano; Vincent Tam; Steven Shadowitz; David N Juurlink; Edward E Etchells Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-02-28
Authors: Jennifer R Pippins; Tejal K Gandhi; Claus Hamann; Chima D Ndumele; Stephanie A Labonville; Ellen K Diedrichsen; Marcy G Carty; Andrew S Karson; Ishir Bhan; Christopher M Coley; Catherine L Liang; Alexander Turchin; Patricia C McCarthy; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian W Jack; Veerappa K Chetty; David Anthony; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Gail M Sanchez; Anna E Johnson; Shaula R Forsythe; Julie K O'Donnell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Christopher Manasseh; Stephen Martin; Larry Culpepper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jacqueline D Wong; Jana M Bajcar; Gary G Wong; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jin-Hyeun Huh; Annemarie Cesta; Gregory R Pond; Olavo A Fernandes Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Bruce E Koehler; Kathleen M Richter; Liz Youngblood; Brian A Cohen; Irving D Prengler; Dunlei Cheng; Andrew L Masica Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Prathibha Varkey; Julie Cunningham; John O'Meara; Robert Bonacci; Nima Desai; Robert Sheeler Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 2.637