Literature DB >> 26455316

Five-Year Risk of Mechanical Ventilation in Community-Dwelling Adults: The Framingham-Intermountain Anticipating Life Support Study.

Allan J Walkey1, Karol M Pencina2, Daniel Knox3,4,5, Kathryn G Kuttler6, Ralph B D'Agostino2, Emelia J Benjamin7,8,9, Samuel M Brown3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a quantitative tool for identifying outpatients most likely to require life support with mechanical ventilation within 5 years.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Framingham Heart Study (FHS) 1991 to 2009 and Intermountain Healthcare clinics 2008 to 2013. PARTICIPANTS: FHS participants (n = 3,666; mean age 74; 58% female) in a derivation cohort and Intermountain Healthcare outpatients aged 65 and older (n = 88,302; mean age 73, 57% female) in an external validation cohort. MEASUREMENTS: Information on demographic characteristics and comorbidities collected during FHS examinations to derive a 5-year risk score for receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit, with external validation using administrative data from outpatients seen at Intermountain Healthcare. A sensitivity analysis investigating model performance for a composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death was performed.
RESULTS: Eighty (2%) FHS participants were mechanically ventilated within 5 years after a FHS examination. Age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, alcohol use, chronic pulmonary disease, and hospitalization within the prior year predicted need for mechanical ventilation within 5 years (c-statistic = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.80). One thousand seven hundred twenty-five (2%) Intermountain Healthcare outpatients underwent mechanical ventilation. The validation model c-statistic was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.66-0.68). Approximately 1% of individuals identified as low risk and 5% to 12% identified as high risk required mechanical ventilation within 5 years. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.75-0.75) for risk prediction of a composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death.
CONCLUSION: A simple risk score using clinical examination data or administrative data may be used to predict 5-year risk of mechanical ventilation or death. Further study is necessary to determine whether use of a risk score enhances advance care planning or improves quality of care of older adults.
© 2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care planning; end-of-life care; mechanical ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26455316      PMCID: PMC5003028          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  22 in total

1.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M L Lee; A J Belanger; L A Cupples; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparison of baseline and repeated measure covariate techniques in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  L A Cupples; R B D'Agostino; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Disability among elderly survivors of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Steven M Albert; Derek C Angus; Judith R Lave; Howard B Degenholtz
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Assessing challenges in end-of-life conversations with elderly patients with multiple morbidities.

Authors:  Toby L Schonfeld; Elizabeth A Stevens; Michelle A Lampman; William L Lyons
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsey C Yourman; Sei J Lee; Mara A Schonberg; Eric W Widera; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; John O'Leary
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Advance care planning and health care preferences of community-dwelling elders: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ellen P McCarthy; Michael J Pencina; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Jane C Evans; Elizabeth J Oberacker; Ralph B D'Agostino; Risa B Burns; Joanne M Murabito
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (Framingham Heart Study): a community-based cohort study.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Lisa M Sullivan; Daniel Levy; Michael J Pencina; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Jennifer F Yamamoto; Jared W Magnani; Thomas M Tadros; William B Kannel; Thomas J Wang; Patrick T Ellinor; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Examining mechanisms for gender differences in admission to intensive care units.

Authors:  Andrea Hill; Clare Ramsey; Peter Dodek; Jean Kozek; Randy Fransoo; Robert Fowler; Malcolm Doupe; Hubert Wong; Damon Scales; Allan Garland
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Accounting for Patient Preferences Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment in Evaluations of Medical Effectiveness and Quality.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Amber E Barnato; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.