RATIONALE: Studies of long-term functional outcomes of elderly survivors of mechanical ventilation (MV) are limited to local samples and biased retrospective, proxy-reported preadmission functional status. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on disability of hospitalization with MV, compared with hospitalization without MV, accounting for prospectively assessed prior functional status. METHODS: Retrospective population-based longitudinal cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older enrolled in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 1996-2003. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Premeasures and postmeasures of disability included mobility difficulty and weighted activities of daily living disability scores ranging from 0 (not disabled) to 100 (completely disabled) based on self-reported health and functional status collected 1 year apart. Among 54,771 person-years (PY) of observation over 7 calendar years of data, 42,890 PY involved no hospitalization, 11,347 PY involved a hospitalization without MV, and 534 PY included a hospitalization with MV. Mortality at 1 year was 8.9%, 23.9%, and 72.5%, respectively. The level of disability at the postassessment was substantially higher for a prototypical patient who survived after hospitalization with MV (adjusted activities of daily living disability score [95% confidence interval] 14.9 [12.2-17.7]; adjusted mobility difficulty score [95% confidence interval] 25.4 [22.4-28.4]) compared with an otherwise identical patient who survived hospitalization without MV (11.5 [11.1-11.9] and 22.3 [21.8-22.9]) or who was not hospitalized (8.0 [7.9-8.1] and 13.4 [13.3-13.6]). CONCLUSIONS: The greater marginal increase in disability among survivors of MV compared with survivors of hospitalization without MV is larger than would be predicted from prior functional status.
RATIONALE: Studies of long-term functional outcomes of elderly survivors of mechanical ventilation (MV) are limited to local samples and biased retrospective, proxy-reported preadmission functional status. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on disability of hospitalization with MV, compared with hospitalization without MV, accounting for prospectively assessed prior functional status. METHODS: Retrospective population-based longitudinal cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older enrolled in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 1996-2003. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Premeasures and postmeasures of disability included mobility difficulty and weighted activities of daily living disability scores ranging from 0 (not disabled) to 100 (completely disabled) based on self-reported health and functional status collected 1 year apart. Among 54,771 person-years (PY) of observation over 7 calendar years of data, 42,890 PY involved no hospitalization, 11,347 PY involved a hospitalization without MV, and 534 PY included a hospitalization with MV. Mortality at 1 year was 8.9%, 23.9%, and 72.5%, respectively. The level of disability at the postassessment was substantially higher for a prototypical patient who survived after hospitalization with MV (adjusted activities of daily living disability score [95% confidence interval] 14.9 [12.2-17.7]; adjusted mobility difficulty score [95% confidence interval] 25.4 [22.4-28.4]) compared with an otherwise identical patient who survived hospitalization without MV (11.5 [11.1-11.9] and 22.3 [21.8-22.9]) or who was not hospitalized (8.0 [7.9-8.1] and 13.4 [13.3-13.6]). CONCLUSIONS: The greater marginal increase in disability among survivors of MV compared with survivors of hospitalization without MV is larger than would be predicted from prior functional status.
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: S R Counsell; C M Holder; L L Liebenauer; R M Palmer; R H Fortinsky; D M Kresevic; L M Quinn; K R Allen; K E Covinsky; C S Landefeld Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Derek C Angus; Thomas J Marrie; D Scott Obrosky; Gilles Clermont; Tony T Dremsizov; Christopher Coley; Michael J Fine; Daniel E Singer; Wishwa N Kapoor Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lakshmipathi Chelluri; Kyung Ah Im; Steven H Belle; Richard Schulz; Armando J Rotondi; Michael P Donahoe; Carl A Sirio; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Michael R Pinsky Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Samuel M Brown; Emily L Wilson; Angela P Presson; Victor D Dinglas; Tom Greene; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham Journal: Thorax Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Liming Huang; Mark E Mikkelsen; Ann Kutney-Lee; Alexandra L Hanlon; Christopher M Murtaugh; Kathryn H Bowles Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lauren E Ferrante; Margaret A Pisani; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda S Leo-Summers; Thomas M Gill Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Nathan E Brummel; Jennifer L Thompson; Christopher G Hughes; Brenda T Pun; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi K Shintani; Ramona O Hopkins; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Laura C Feemster; Colin R Cooke; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Catherine L Hough; William J Ehlenbach; David H Au; Vincent S Fan Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-01