Literature DB >> 22074194

The relationship between attitudes towards different containment measures and their usage in a national sample of psychiatric inpatients.

C Dack1, J Ross, L Bowers.   

Abstract

The aims of this report were to explore the relationships between patients' approval of containment measures, their levels of usage and patients' individual experience of each measure. Additionally the psychometric properties of the Attitudes to Containment Measures Questionnaire (ACMQ) were tested. A cross-sectional design was used. The ACMQ was completed by 1361 patients across 136 acute psychiatric wards from three regions in England that participated in the 'City 128' study. Staff on each ward completed the Patient-Staff Conflict Checklist - Shift Report at the end of each shift to log how often each containment measure was used. Frequency of patient reported containment correlated with rates reported by staff. Patients had separate attitudes to each containment measure rather than an attitude towards containment in general. High frequency of coerced intramuscular (IM) medication use was associated with negative attitudes to nearly all types of containment. The ACMQ has good construct validity. In wards where high levels of IM medication are used, all patients have lower approval ratings for a number of other containment measures. This suggests that IM medication has a negative impact not only on those subjected to it but also patients who witness it. Measures to reduce the negative impact of IM medication are discussed.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22074194     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01832.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  5 in total

1.  Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Ling; Kristin Cleverley; Athina Perivolaris
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Use of Coercive Measures during Involuntary Psychiatric Admission and Treatment Outcomes: Data from a Prospective Study across 10 European Countries.

Authors:  Paul McLaughlin; Domenico Giacco; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Acceptability and use of coercive methods across differing service configurations with and without seclusion and/or psychiatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Sophie A Pettit; Len Bowers; Alex Tulloch; Alexis E Cullen; Lois Biggin Moylan; Faisil Sethi; Paul McCrone; John Baker; Alan Quirk; Duncan Stewart
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Comparing Attitudes to Containment Measures of Patients, Health Care Professionals and Next of Kin.

Authors:  Thomas Reisch; Simone Beeri; Georges Klein; Philipp Meier; Philippe Pfeifer; Etienne Buehler; Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Attitudinal variance among patients, next of kin and health care professionals towards the use of containment measures in three psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger; Etienne Buehler; Sonja Moetteli; Georges Klein; Simone Beeri; Thomas Reisch
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.