| Literature DB >> 26453429 |
Muhammad Imran1, Faqir Muhammad Anjum2, Muhammad Nadeem3, Nazir Ahmad4, Muhammad Kamran Khan5, Zarina Mushtaq6, Shahzad Hussain7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The full-fat flaxseed meal has obtained relatively new flourished concept as staple chicken feedstuff for the production of designer eggs. However, unprocessed flaxseed also encloses well documented anti-nutritional factors which are associated with growth depression of laying hens. The present research work was carried out to evaluate the impact of full-fat extruded flaxseed meal supplemented diets on productivity performance of hens and production of modified ω-3 fatty acids-enriched eggs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26453429 PMCID: PMC4599773 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0127-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Experimental diets with percentage composition for Babcock laying hens
| Ingredients | Experimental diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10 % EFM | 20 % EFM | 30 % EFM | |
| Corn | 35 | 35 | 35 | 20 |
| Wheat | 05 | 09 | 15 | 20 |
| Rice polishing | 15 | 10 | 05 | - |
| Canola meal | 15 | 10 | 05 | - |
| EFM | - | 10 | 20 | 30 |
| Gluten 60 % | 05 | 4.5 | 03 | - |
| Gluten 30 % | - | - | - | 5.5 |
| Wheat bran | - | - | - | 07 |
| Soybean meal | 08 | 08 | 08 | 08 |
| Vegetable oil | 08 | 04 | - | - |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Lime stone (ground) | 07 | 7.5 | 07 | 7.5 |
| Vitamin/mineral premix | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Analyzed nutrient content | ||||
| Crude protein (%) | 16.9 ± 0.1a | 17 ± 0.1a | 17 ± 0.1a | 17 ± 0.1a |
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) | 2838 ± 4a | 2840 ± 3a | 2844 ± 2a | 2846 ± 3a |
| Crude fat (%) | 10.1 ± 0.3a | 10.2 ± 0.3a | 10.2 ± 0.2a | 10.3 ± 0.2a |
| 1C16:0 * | 12.1 ± 0.1a | 9.6 ± 0.1b | 7.6 ± 0.1c | 6.3 ± 0.1d |
| 2C18:0 * | 16 ± 0.3a | 13.2 ± 0.2b | 9.4 ± 0.3c | 7.4 ± 0.4d |
| 3C18:1 * | 28.6 ± 0.5a | 23.5 ± 0.4c | 23 ± 0.5c | 17.6 ± 0.5d |
| 4C18:2 * | 38.2 ± 0.7d | 38.9 ± 0.7c | 41.5 ± 0.8b | 42.8 ± 0.9a |
| 5C18:3 * | 2.7 ± 0.1e | 8.2 ± 0.4d | 14.2 ± 0.6c | 21.1 ± 0.7b |
| 6C20:4 * | 0.6 ± 0.1a | 0.4 ± 0.1a | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 0.2 ± 0.1a |
| 7C20:5 * | 1.5 ± 0.13a | 1.3 ± 0.1a | 1.1 ± 0.1a | 1 ± 0.1a |
| 8C22:6 * | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 0.2 ± 0.1a |
| Calculated nutrient content | ||||
| Calcium (%) | 3.04a | 3.12a | 3.16a | 3.25a |
| Available p (%) | 0.59a | 0.50a | 0.55a | 0.62a |
| Methonine (%) | 0.30a | 0.33a | 0.35a | 0.36a |
| Lysine (%) | 0.78a | 0.84a | 0.82a | 0.85a |
Means sharing similar letters in a column for individual parameter do not differ significantly from one another (p > 0.05)
1Palmitic 2Stearic 3Oleic 4Linoleic 5Linolenic 6Arachadonic 7Eicosapentaenoic 8Docosahexaenoic
EFM Extruded flaxseed meal
*Percent of total fatty acids composition
Effect of experimental diets on hen performance and biochemical constituents of eggs
| Performance parameter | Experimental diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | EFM (10 %) | EFM (20 %) | EFM (30 %) | |
| Feed consumption (g/bird/day) | 108 ± 2a | 104 ± 2b | 102 ± 1c | 101 ± 1d |
| Body weight (g) | 1613 ± 7a | 1607 ± 8a | 1593 ± 9b | 1546 ± 10c |
| Egg production (%) | 93 ± 3a | 85 ± 3b | 78 ± 2c | 64 ± 4d |
| Egg weight (g) | 61.5 ± 0.9a | 61.6 ± 1.0a | 62 ± 1.1ab | 62.3 ± 1.1b |
| Biochemical constituent | ||||
| Total lipids (g/100 g) | 27.9 ± 0.1a | 27.9 ± 0.1a | 27.9 ± 0.1a | 27.8 ± 0.1a |
| Cholesterol (mg/egg) | 218 ± 2a | 216 ± 3a | 214 ± 3a | 214 ± 3a |
| Oleic acid (%)* | 36 ± 0.1a | 34.7 ± 0.2b | 32.1 ± 0.1c | 30 ± 0.1d |
| Linoleic acid (%)* | 11.1 ± 0.1d | 12.4 ± 0.1c | 13.4 ± 0.1b | 14.2 ± 0.1a |
| Linolenic acid (%)* | 1 ± 0.1d | 6.3 ± 0.3c | 9.6 ± 0.4b | 13.5 ± 0.3a |
| Arachidonic acid (%)* | 1.7 ± 0.1a | 1 ± 0.2b | 0.7 ± 0.1c | 0.5 ± 0.1d |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (%)* | 0.1 ± 0.1c | 0.5 ± 0.1b | 0.8 ± 0.1a | 0.9 ± 0.1a |
| Σω-6 to Σω-3 fatty acids ratio | 9.6 ± 0.2a | 4.1 ± 0.1b | 3.4 ± 0.2c | 2.3 ± 0.1d |
EFM Extruded flaxseed meal
Means sharing similar letters in a row for individual parameter do not differ significantly from one another (p > 0.05)
*Percent of total fatty acids composition
Comparison of experimental diets (significance) for hen productivity parameters and fatty acids profile of eggs
| Experimental Diet (Comparison Pair) | Hen productivity parameters | Fatty acids profile of eggs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | BW | EP | EW | Oleic acid | Linoleic acid | Linolenic acid | Arachidonic acid | Docosahexaenoic acid | Σω-6 to Σω-3 fatty acids ratio | |
| Control vs. EFM (10 %) | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | * | * | * | ** |
| Control vs. EFM (20 %) | * | NS | NS | * | ** | * | ** | * | ** | ** |
| Control vs. EFM (30 %) | * | *** | ** | * | ** | ** | *** | * | ** | ** |
| EFM (10 %) vs. EFM (20 %) | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | NS |
| EFM (10 %) vs. EFM (30 %) | NS | *** | * | * | ** | * | * | * | * | * |
| EFM (20 %) vs. EFM (30 %) | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
* = Significant (p ≤ 0.05) ** = Significant (p ≤ 0.01) *** = Significant (p ≤ 0.001) NS = Non-significant (p > 0.05)
EFM Extruded flaxseed meal
FC Feed consumption (g/bird/day)
EP Egg production (%)
EW Egg weight (g)
BW Body weight (g)
Fig. 1Comparison of experimental diets for organoleptic acceptability of resultant Bio-omega-3 eggs