Literature DB >> 26450058

Palaeomagnetic field intensity variations suggest Mesoproterozoic inner-core nucleation.

A J Biggin1, E J Piispa2, L J Pesonen3, R Holme1, G A Paterson4, T Veikkolainen3, L Tauxe5.   

Abstract

The Earth's inner core grows by the freezing of liquid iron at its surface. The point in history at which this process initiated marks a step-change in the thermal evolution of the planet. Recent computational and experimental studies have presented radically differing estimates of the thermal conductivity of the Earth's core, resulting in estimates of the timing of inner-core nucleation ranging from less than half a billion to nearly two billion years ago. Recent inner-core nucleation (high thermal conductivity) requires high outer-core temperatures in the early Earth that complicate models of thermal evolution. The nucleation of the core leads to a different convective regime and potentially different magnetic field structures that produce an observable signal in the palaeomagnetic record and allow the date of inner-core nucleation to be estimated directly. Previous studies searching for this signature have been hampered by the paucity of palaeomagnetic intensity measurements, by the lack of an effective means of assessing their reliability, and by shorter-timescale geomagnetic variations. Here we examine results from an expanded Precambrian database of palaeomagnetic intensity measurements selected using a new set of reliability criteria. Our analysis provides intensity-based support for the dominant dipolarity of the time-averaged Precambrian field, a crucial requirement for palaeomagnetic reconstructions of continents. We also present firm evidence for the existence of very long-term variations in geomagnetic strength. The most prominent and robust transition in the record is an increase in both average field strength and variability that is observed to occur between a billion and 1.5 billion years ago. This observation is most readily explained by the nucleation of the inner core occurring during this interval; the timing would tend to favour a modest value of core thermal conductivity and supports a simple thermal evolution model for the Earth.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450058     DOI: 10.1038/nature15523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  7 in total

1.  Thermal and electrical conductivity of iron at Earth's core conditions.

Authors:  Monica Pozzo; Chris Davies; David Gubbins; Dario Alfè
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Instability of thermoremanence and the problem of estimating the ancient geomagnetic field strength from non-single-domain recorders.

Authors:  Ron Shaar; Lisa Tauxe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Valet; Laure Meynadier; Yohan Guyodo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Proterozoic low orbital obliquity and axial-dipolar geomagnetic field from evaporite palaeolatitudes.

Authors:  David A D Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effects of electron correlations on transport properties of iron at Earth's core conditions.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; R E Cohen; K Haule
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of liquid Fe alloys at high P and T, and heat flux in Earth's core.

Authors:  Nico de Koker; Gerd Steinle-Neumann; Vojtech Vlcek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Magnetic force microscopy reveals meta-stable magnetic domain states that prevent reliable absolute palaeointensity experiments.

Authors:  Lennart V de Groot; Karl Fabian; Iman A Bakelaar; Mark J Dekkers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Powering Earth's dynamo with magnesium precipitation from the core.

Authors:  Joseph G O'Rourke; David J Stevenson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Origin of microbial biomineralization and magnetotaxis during the Archean.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Greig A Paterson; Qiyun Zhu; Yinzhao Wang; Evguenia Kopylova; Ying Li; Rob Knight; Dennis A Bazylinski; Rixiang Zhu; Joseph L Kirschvink; Yongxin Pan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Crustal evolution and mantle dynamics through Earth history.

Authors:  Jun Korenaga
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth's core conditions.

Authors:  Kenji Ohta; Yasuhiro Kuwayama; Kei Hirose; Katsuya Shimizu; Yasuo Ohishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mid-Paleozoic dipole low.

Authors:  Louise M A Hawkins; J Michael Grappone; Courtney J Sprain; Patipan Saengduean; Edward J Sage; Sheikerra Thomas-Cunningham; Banusha Kugabalan; Andrew J Biggin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Early Cambrian renewal of the geodynamo and the origin of inner core structure.

Authors:  Tinghong Zhou; John A Tarduno; Francis Nimmo; Rory D Cottrell; Richard K Bono; Mauricio Ibanez-Mejia; Wentao Huang; Matt Hamilton; Kenneth Kodama; Aleksey V Smirnov; Ben Crummins; Frank Padgett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity.

Authors:  Greig A Paterson; Adrian R Muxworthy; Yuhji Yamamoto; Yongxin Pan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Advancing Precambrian palaeomagnetism with the PALEOMAGIA and PINT(QPI) databases.

Authors:  Toni H Veikkolainen; Andrew J Biggin; Lauri J Pesonen; David A Evans; Nicholas A Jarboe
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Quantitative estimates of average geomagnetic axial dipole dominance in deep geological time.

Authors:  Andrew J Biggin; Richard K Bono; Domenico G Meduri; Courtney J Sprain; Christopher J Davies; Richard Holme; Pavel V Doubrovine
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  High geomagnetic field intensity recorded by anorthosite xenoliths requires a strongly powered late Mesoproterozoic geodynamo.

Authors:  Yiming Zhang; Nicholas L Swanson-Hysell; Margaret S Avery; Roger R Fu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.