Literature DB >> 15944701

Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years.

Jean-Pierre Valet1, Laure Meynadier, Yohan Guyodo.   

Abstract

Independent records of relative magnetic palaeointensity from sediment cores in different areas of the world can be stacked together to extract the evolution of the geomagnetic dipole moment and thus provide information regarding the processes governing the geodynamo. So far, this procedure has been limited to the past 800,000 years (800 kyr; ref. 3), which does not include any geomagnetic reversals. Here we present a composite curve that shows the evolution of the dipole moment during the past two million years. This reconstruction is in good agreement with the absolute dipole moments derived from volcanic lavas, which were used for calibration. We show that, at least during this period, the time-averaged field was higher during periods without reversals but the amplitude of the short-term oscillations remained the same. As a consequence, few intervals of very low intensity, and thus fewer instabilities, are expected during periods with a strong average dipole moment, whereas more excursions and reversals are expected during periods of weak field intensity. We also observe that the axial dipole begins to decay 60-80 kyr before reversals, but rebuilds itself in the opposite direction in only a few thousand years.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15944701     DOI: 10.1038/nature03674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  12 in total

1.  Palaeomagnetic field intensity variations suggest Mesoproterozoic inner-core nucleation.

Authors:  A J Biggin; E J Piispa; L J Pesonen; R Holme; G A Paterson; T Veikkolainen; L Tauxe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Changes in earth's dipole.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Hagay Amit
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-17

3.  Gravitational dynamos and the low-frequency geomagnetic secular variation.

Authors:  P Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Valet; Alexandre Fournier
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 22.000

5.  Midlatitude cooling caused by geomagnetic field minimum during polarity reversal.

Authors:  Ikuko Kitaba; Masayuki Hyodo; Shigehiro Katoh; David L Dettman; Hiroshi Sato
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Radiometric 81Kr dating identifies 120,000-year-old ice at Taylor Glacier, Antarctica.

Authors:  Christo Buizert; Daniel Baggenstos; Wei Jiang; Roland Purtschert; Vasilii V Petrenko; Zheng-Tian Lu; Peter Müller; Tanner Kuhl; James Lee; Jeffrey P Severinghaus; Edward J Brook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bats respond to very weak magnetic fields.

Authors:  Lan-Xiang Tian; Yong-Xin Pan; Walter Metzner; Jin-Shuo Zhang; Bing-Fang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Authigenic 10Be/9Be ratio signatures of the cosmogenic nuclide production linked to geomagnetic dipole moment variation since the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary.

Authors:  Quentin Simon; Nicolas Thouveny; Didier L Bourlès; Jean-Pierre Valet; Franck Bassinot; Lucie Ménabréaz; Valéry Guillou; Sandrine Choy; Luc Beaufort
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.848

9.  Geological support for the Umbrella Effect as a link between geomagnetic field and climate.

Authors:  Ikuko Kitaba; Masayuki Hyodo; Takeshi Nakagawa; Shigehiro Katoh; David L Dettman; Hiroshi Sato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Control of Earth-like magnetic fields on the transformation of ferrihydrite to hematite and goethite.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Jiang; Qingsong Liu; Mark J Dekkers; Vidal Barrón; José Torrent; Andrew P Roberts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.