| Literature DB >> 26448777 |
Huan Wang1, Lei Wang2, Xian Shi3, Song Qi4, Sen Hu2, Zhangqi Tong1, Zhuhong Ma1, Yan Qian1, Daniela Litscher5, Gerhard Litscher5.
Abstract
Severe burn injuries may result in gastrointestinal paralysis, and barrier dysfunction due to gut ischemia and lowered vagus excitability. In this study we investigate whether electroacupuncture (EA) at Zusanli (ST36) could prevent severe scalds-induced gut ischemia, paralysis, and barrier dysfunction and whether the protective role of EA at ST36 is related to the vagus nerve. 35% burn area rats were divided into six groups: (a) EAN: EA nonchannel acupoints followed by scald injury; (b) EA: EA at ST36 after scald injury; (c) VGX/EA: vagotomy (VGX) before EA at ST36 and scald injury; (d) VGX/EAN: VGX before EAN and scald injury; (e) atropine/EA: applying atropine before scald injury and then EA at ST36; (f) atropine/EAN: applying atropine before scald injury and then EA at nonchannel acupoints. EA at the Zusanli point significantly promoted the intestinal impelling ratio and increased the amount of mucosal blood flow after scald injury. The plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) and intestinal permeability decreased significantly after scald injury in the EA group compared with others. However, EA after atropine injection or cervical vagotomy failed to improve intestinal motility and mucosa blood flow suggesting that the mechanism of EA may be related to the activation of the cholinergic nerve pathway.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26448777 PMCID: PMC4581501 DOI: 10.1155/2015/787393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Intestinal impelling ratio was detected at −0.5, 2, and 6 h after scalds injury. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = five animals at every time point per group). ∗ versus −0.5 h among the same group, P < 0.05; # versus EA group among 2 h and 6 h, P < 0.05.
Figure 2Mucosal blood flow in the small intestine was detected at −0.5, 2, and 6 h after scalds injury. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = five animals at every time point per group). ∗ versus −0.5 h among the same group, P < 0.05; # versus EA group among 2 h and 6 h, P < 0.05.
Figure 3The intestinal permeability was detected in an in vivo assay 6 h after the scalds injury. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = five animals at every time point per group). # versus EA group, P < 0.05.
Figure 4The level of plasma DAO was detected at −0.5, 2, and 6 h after scalds injury. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = five animals at every time point per group). ∗ versus −0.5 h among the same group, P < 0.05; # versus EA group among 2 h and 6 h, P < 0.05.