| Literature DB >> 29805466 |
Huan Wang1,2, Zhen Liu3, Yuanshi Liu4, Zhanqi Tong1, Yan Qian1, Liping Chen1, Bin Jiang1, Mingxiong Lin1, Tao Yang4, Lu Gao1, Mingjun Chen1, Daniela Litscher1,2, Lu Wang1,2, Gerhard Litscher1,2.
Abstract
Fluid resuscitation could hardly be performed immediately after fatal hemorrhagic shock in outpatients. We investigated whether electroacupuncture (EA) at Zusanli (ST36) could prevent fatal hemorrhagic shock induced heart failure with delayed fluid resuscitation and whether the protective role of EA is related to the autonomic nervous system. Sixty Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups (n = 12 each): group of sham hemorrhagic shock (SHAM), group of EA, group of sham EA (SEA), group of delayed fluid resuscitation with EA (EA + DR), and group of delayed fluid resuscitation with SEA (SEA + DR). After blood loss for 6 hours, caspase-3 activity and positive rate of TUNEL in EA + DR group were significantly lower than in other hemorrhagic shock groups (e.g., versus SEA + DR: 0.156 ± 0.039 versus 0.301 ± 0.042; P < 0.05). Immediately EA treatment after the blood loss enhanced the protective effect of delayed resuscitation on the cardiac tissue of hemorrhagic shock rats. Considering the significant changes of epinephrine (137.8 ± 6.9 ng/L versus 98.6 ± 7.4 ng/L; P < 0.05) and acetylcholine (405 ± 8.6 pmol/L versus 341 ± 10.1 pmol/L; P < 0.05) after EA treatment (SEA + DR versus EA + DR), this cardiac protective effect may be related to regulation of the autonomic nervous system.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805466 PMCID: PMC5901936 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2513791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1All groups indicated with “a” versus SHAM group, P < 0.05; EA group versus SEA group, P > 0.05. EA + DR group versus SEA + DR group within 6 h, P < 0.05.
Figure 25 views (a–e) of the heart tissue under the 400x microscope which were randomly taken from different groups. The apoptotic nuclei were labeled with green fluorescence and observed under fluorescence microscope. (a–e) separately represent the groups of SHAM (a), EA (b), SEA (c), EA + DR (d), and SEA + DR (e).
Figure 3All groups indicated with “a” versus SHAM group, P < 0.05; EA group versus SEA group, P > 0.05. EA + DR group versus SEA + DR group within 6 h, P < 0.05.
Figure 4The level of plasma EPA was detected at 0, 3, and 6 h after shock. EA group versus SEA group within 3 h, P < 0.05. EA + DR group versus SEA + DR group within 6 h, P < 0.05.
Figure 5The level of plasma ACH was detected at 0, 3, and 6 h after shock. EA group versus SEA group within 3 h, P < 0.05. EA + DR group versus SEA + DR group within 6 h, P < 0.05.