| Literature DB >> 26446158 |
Wei Gu1, Mingduo Zhang2, Shaojun Wen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No previous meta-analysis was to report the association between the apolipoprotein B (APOB) XbaI and EcoRI polymorphisms and serum lipids in Chinese. We performed the study to investigate their potentially association. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26446158 PMCID: PMC4596460 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0125-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Main characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis
| First author,year | Ethnicity | Region | Sample size | SNPs | Character of subjects | Method | Lipid profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bai, [ | Han | Ningxia | 165 | EcoRI | CA/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Chai, [ | Han | Shanghai | 82 | XbaI | CI/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Evans, [ | Han | Shanxi | 143 | XbaI | HT | PCR-RFLP | TG,LDL,HDL |
| Fan, [ | Han | Fujian | 387 | XbaI | Hyperlipidemia | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Guo, [ | Han | Liaoning | 55 | XbaI | CI | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Han, [ | Han | Shanghai | 631 | XbaI | Cholelithiasis/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Hu, [ | Han | Guangxi | 150 | XbaI | PNS | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Hu, [ | Han | Guangxi | 200 | XbaI | HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Ji,[ | Han | Inner mongolian | 120 | EcoRI,XbaI | Cholelithiasis/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Li, [ | Han | Tianjing | 71 | EcoRI,XbaI | CHD | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Liu, [ | Han | Hunan | 230 | EcoRI | CI/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Liu, [ | Han | Shanghai | 186 | XbaI | Gastric cancer | PCR-RFLP | TC,LDL |
| Liu,[ | Li/Han | Hainan | 351 | XbaI | HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Ma, [ | Yao | Guangdong | 500 | EcoRI,XbaI | Hyperlipidemia/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Pan, [ | Han | Taiwan | 301 | EcoRI,XbaI | CHD/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Saha, [ | Han | Singapore | 196 | EcoRI,XbaI | HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Tan, [ | Han | Jiangsu | 211 | EcoRI,XbaI | Cholelithiasis/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Wang, [ | Han | Beijing | 377 | XbaI | CI/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Wei, [ | Han | Sichuan | 169 | XbaI | Cholelithiasis/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Xie, [ | Han | Xinjiang | 300 | EcoRI,XbaI | Hyperlipidemia/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Yan, [ | Han | Beijing | 257 | EcoRI | CHD/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Yao, [ | Han | Jiangsu | 141 | XbaI | CI/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Yao, [ | Han | Xinjiang | 112 | EcoRI,XbaI | fatty liver | DNA chips | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Ye, [ | Han | Beijing | 203 | XbaI | CHD/HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Ye, [ | Han | Beijing | 88 | XbaI | Hyperlipidemia | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL |
| Zhang, [ | Han | Hunan | 130 | XbaI | CI | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Zhang,[ | Han | Xinjiang | 154 | EcoRI | CHD | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Zhang, [ | Han | Beijing | 82 | EcoRI,XbaI | Hyperlipidemia | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Zhao, [ | Han | Beijing | 117 | XbaI | CI | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
| Zhu, [ | Han | Beijing | 308 | XbaI | HT | PCR-RFLP | TC,TG,LDL,HDL |
CA carotid atherosclerosis, HT healthy individuals, CI cerebral infarction, PNS primary nephrotic syndrome, CHD coronary heart disease, PCR-RFLP polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein
Overall and subgroup associations of the APOB XbaI polymorphism and lipids
| Lipids | Overall or subgroups | Studies | Subjects | OR (95 %) |
| Pheterogenity | Pe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | Overall | 37 | 5468 | −0.55[−0.86,−0.23] | 0.0006 | <0.01 | 0.08 |
| Han | 34 | 4812 | −0.59[−0.94,−0.24] | 0.001 | <0.01 | ||
| Non-Han minorities | 3 | 651 | −0.25[−0.61, 0.10] | 0.16 | 0.08 | ||
| HT | 16 | 2708 | −0.61[−1.3, 0.07] | 0.08 | <0.01 | ||
| CHD | 3 | 322 | 0.02[−0.37, 0.42] | 0.90 | 0.71 | ||
| CI | 6 | 577 | −0.85[−1.46,−0.24] | 0.007 | <0.01 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 5 | 957 | −0.24[−0.71, 0.22] | 0.31 | <0.01 | ||
| Cholelithiasis | 4 | 456 | −0.54[−0.91,−0.18] | 0.004 | 0.11 | ||
| TG | Overall | 37 | 5425 | −0.30[−0.47,−0.14] | 0.0004 | <0.01 | 0.25 |
| Han | 34 | 4774 | −0.32[−0.50,−0.13] | 0.0009 | <0.01 | ||
| Non-Han minorities | 3 | 651 | −0.19[−0.41, 0.02] | 0.08 | 0.98 | ||
| HT | 17 | 2851 | −0.31[−0.62, 0.00] | 0.05 | <0.01 | ||
| CHD | 3 | 322 | −0.53[−0.93,−0.13] | 0.009 | 0.41 | ||
| CI | 6 | 577 | −0.50[−1.02, 0.02] | 0.06 | 0.0001 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 5 | 957 | −0.29[−0.62, 0.04] | 0.09 | 0.01 | ||
| Cholelithiasis | 4 | 456 | −0.11[−0.34, 0.12] | 0.36 | 0.86 | ||
| LDL | Overall | 38 | 5611 | −0.23[−0.46,−0.00] | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.80 |
| Han | 35 | 4960 | −0.23[−0.49, 0.03] | 0.09 | <0.01 | ||
| Non-Han minorities | 3 | 651 | −0.26[−0.47,−0.04] | 0.02 | 0.5 | ||
| HT | 17 | 2851 | −0.21[−0.60, 0.18] | 0.29 | <0.01 | ||
| CHD | 3 | 322 | 0.15[−0.25, 0.54] | 0.47 | 0.6 | ||
| CI | 6 | 577 | −0.52[−1.08, 0.05] | 0.07 | <0.01 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 5 | 957 | 0.15[−0.47, 0.78] | 0.63 | <0.01 | ||
| Cholelithiasis | 4 | 456 | −0.4[−0.64,−0.17] | 0.0007 | 0.46 | ||
| HDL | Overall | 36 | 5337 | 0.17[−0.08, 0.41] | 0.18 | <0.01 | 0.86 |
| Han | 33 | 4686 | 0.15[−0.12, 0.43] | 0.27 | <0.01 | ||
| Non-Han minorities | 3 | 651 | 0.24[0.01, 0.47] | 0.04 | 0.33 | ||
| HT | 17 | 2851 | 0.11[−0.43, 0.64] | 0.07 | <0.01 | ||
| CHD | 3 | 322 | 0.50[0.11, 0.90] | 0.01 | 0.78 | ||
| CI | 6 | 577 | 0.43[0.13, 0.74] | 0.005 | 0.11 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 | 869 | 0.10[−0.08, 0.27] | 0.27 | 0.97 | ||
| Cholelithiasis | 4 | 456 | −0.10[−0.33, 0.13] | 0.40 | 0.78 |
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein, HT healthy individuals, CHD coronary heart disease, CI cerebral infarction
P value: the significance of the pooled estimate (95 % confidence interval)
Pheterogeneity: the Q statistic for heterogeneity
Pe: Egger’s statistic for publication bias
All results were calculated under the dominant genetic model (X-X- vs. X + X-/X + X+)
Fig. 1Association between the APOB XbaI polymorphism and LDL under the dominant genetic model (X-X- vs. X + X-/X + X+). “X-“ represents the X-X- genotype; X+ represents the X + X-/X + X+ genotypes
Overall and subgroup associations of the APOB EcoRI polymorphism and lipids
| Lipids | Overall or subgroups | Studies | Subjects | OR (95 %) |
| Pheterogenity | Pe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | Overall | 21 | 2653 | −0.28[−0.58,0.01] | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.64 |
| Han | 19 | 2153 | −0.27[−0.61,0.07] | 0.11 | <0.01 | ||
| HT | 9 | 1142 | −0.19[−0.89,0.52] | 0.61 | <0.01 | ||
| CHD | 4 | 529 | −0.25[−0.56,0.05] | 0.1 | 0.29 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 | 482 | −0.56[−0.78,−0.35] | <0.01 | 0.45 | ||
| TG | Overall | 21 | 2653 | −0.14[−0.32,0.03] | 0.11 | 0.003 | 0.62 |
| Han | 19 | 2153 | −0.14[−0.34,0.07] | 0.19 | 0.001 | ||
| HT | 9 | 1142 | −0.01[−0.35,0.34] | 0.97 | 0.002 | ||
| CHD | 4 | 529 | −0.26[−0.55,0.04] | 0.09 | 0.33 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 | 482 | −0.15[−0.49,0.18] | 0.37 | 0.11 | ||
| LDL | Overall | 21 | 2653 | −0.27[−0.49,−0.05] | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.51 |
| Han | 19 | 2153 | −0.28[−0.53,−0.02] | 0.04 | <0.01 | ||
| HT | 9 | 1142 | −0.26[−0.59,0.07] | 0.13 | 0.005 | ||
| CHD | 4 | 529 | −0.21[−0.73,0.31] | 0.43 | 0.01 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 | 482 | −0.36[−0.88,0.15] | 0.17 | 0.006 | ||
| HDL | Overall | 21 | 2653 | 0.17[0.03, 0.30] | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.44 |
| Han | 19 | 2153 | 0.13[−0.02, 0.28] | 0.09 | 0.2 | ||
| HT | 9 | 1142 | 0.13[−0.09, 0.35] | 0.25 | 0.25 | ||
| CHD | 4 | 529 | 0.24[−0.03, 0.52] | 0.08 | 0.5 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 3 | 482 | −0.03[−0.44,0.38] | 0.89 | 0.04 |
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL low density lipoprotein, HDL high density lipoprotein, HT healthy individuals, CHD coronary heart disease
Pvalue: the significance of the pooled estimate (95 % confidence interval)
Pheterogeneity: the Q statistic for heterogeneity
Pe: Egger’s statistic for publication bias
All results were calculated under the dominant genetic model (E + E+ vs. E + E-/E-E-)
Fig. 2Association between the APOB EcoRI polymorphism and LDL under the dominant genetic model (E + E+ vs. E + E-/E-E-). “E + “ represents the E + E+ genotype; E- represents the E + E-/E-E- genotypes