Dan J Raz1, Virginia Sun2, Jae Y Kim3, Anna Cathy Williams2, Marianna Koczywas4, Mihaela Cristea4, Karen Reckamp4, Jennifer Hayter5, Brian Tiep6, Betty Ferrell2. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. Electronic address: draz@coh.org. 2. Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. 4. Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. 5. Department of Rehabilitation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. 6. Department of Respiratory Disease and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures provide the best chance for cure and long-term survival in non-small cell cancer (NSCLC). Persistent symptoms after surgical procedures are common, and they can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term effect of an interdisciplinary supportive care intervention to improve HRQOL, psychological distress, and symptoms in lung cancer survivors who were treated surgically. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative intent resection for NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective sequential design whereby the control group was accrued first, followed by the intervention group. Patients in the intervention group were assessed and presented by nurses at weekly interdisciplinary care meetings before surgical procedures, and received four educational sessions (physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being) after surgical procedures. Appropriate symptom management, social work, rehabilitation, and spiritual support interventions were coordinated by the study nurse. In both groups, HRQOL, psychological distress, and symptom severity were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks with the use of surveys that included the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L), Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), and Distress Thermometer. Mean survey scores were analyzed with factorial analysis of covariance at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 71 survivors (control = 33; intervention = 38) were accrued. No difference was found in age, baseline performance status, or stage of disease between groups. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less distress (mean, 1.0 versus 4.0; range, 0 to 10; p < 0.001) and more favorable mean FACT-L scores (126.1 versus 98.7; range, 0 to 140; p < 0.001) and LCS scores (29.4 versus 23.6; range, 0 to 32; p < 0.001) at 12 months. The mean scores of all categories of questions in FACT-L (physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being) were considerably more favorable in the intervention group at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary supportive care intervention improves psychological distress and HRQOL at 12 months after lung cancer surgical procedures. This study has important implications in improving HRQOL of lung cancer survivors after surgical procedures. Further study is warranted on incorporating the interdisciplinary personalized interventions used in this study into clinical practice for lung cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures provide the best chance for cure and long-term survival in non-small cell cancer (NSCLC). Persistent symptoms after surgical procedures are common, and they can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term effect of an interdisciplinary supportive care intervention to improve HRQOL, psychological distress, and symptoms in lung cancer survivors who were treated surgically. METHODS:Patients undergoing curative intent resection for NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective sequential design whereby the control group was accrued first, followed by the intervention group. Patients in the intervention group were assessed and presented by nurses at weekly interdisciplinary care meetings before surgical procedures, and received four educational sessions (physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being) after surgical procedures. Appropriate symptom management, social work, rehabilitation, and spiritual support interventions were coordinated by the study nurse. In both groups, HRQOL, psychological distress, and symptom severity were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks with the use of surveys that included the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L), Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), and Distress Thermometer. Mean survey scores were analyzed with factorial analysis of covariance at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 71 survivors (control = 33; intervention = 38) were accrued. No difference was found in age, baseline performance status, or stage of disease between groups. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less distress (mean, 1.0 versus 4.0; range, 0 to 10; p < 0.001) and more favorable mean FACT-L scores (126.1 versus 98.7; range, 0 to 140; p < 0.001) and LCS scores (29.4 versus 23.6; range, 0 to 32; p < 0.001) at 12 months. The mean scores of all categories of questions in FACT-L (physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being) were considerably more favorable in the intervention group at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary supportive care intervention improves psychological distress and HRQOL at 12 months after lung cancer surgical procedures. This study has important implications in improving HRQOL of lung cancer survivors after surgical procedures. Further study is warranted on incorporating the interdisciplinary personalized interventions used in this study into clinical practice for lung cancer survivors.
Authors: David Cella; David T Eton; Diane L Fairclough; Philip Bonomi; Anne E Heyes; Cheryl Silberman; Michael K Wolf; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Kristi D Graves; Susanne M Arnold; Celia L Love; Kenneth L Kirsh; Pamela G Moore; Steven D Passik Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2006-11-03 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Nabil P Rizk; Amanda Ghanie; Meier Hsu; Manjit S Bains; Robert J Downey; Inderpal S Sarkaria; David J Finley; Prasad S Adusumilli; James Huang; Camelia S Sima; Jack E Burkhalter; Bernard J Park; Valerie W Rusch Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Glenn Gade; Ingrid Venohr; Douglas Conner; Kathleen McGrady; Jeffrey Beane; Robert H Richardson; Marilyn P Williams; Marcia Liberson; Mark Blum; Richard Della Penna Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Linda Sarna; Mary E Cooley; Jean K Brown; Cynthia Chernecky; David Elashoff; Jenny Kotlerman Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Cecilia Pompili; Kevin N Franks; Alessandro Brunelli; Yusuf S Hussain; Patricia Holch; Matthew E Callister; Jonathan M Robson; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Galina Velikova Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Virginia Sun; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Walter Chang; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Carolina Uranga; Anne Marie Ireland; Karen Reckamp; Brian Tiep; Jennifer Hayter; Michael Lew; Betty Ferrell; Ruth McCorkle Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.037