Literature DB >> 25086945

A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy.

Nabil P Rizk1, Amanda Ghanie2, Meier Hsu2, Manjit S Bains2, Robert J Downey2, Inderpal S Sarkaria2, David J Finley2, Prasad S Adusumilli2, James Huang2, Camelia S Sima2, Jack E Burkhalter2, Bernard J Park2, Valerie W Rusch2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive lung lobectomy and segmentectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are assumed to result in better quality of life and less postoperative pain compared with standard open approaches. To date, few prospective studies have compared the two approaches. We performed a prospective cohort study to compare quality of life and pain scores during the first 12 months after VATS or open anatomic resection.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled from May 2009 to April 2012. Patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who were scheduled to undergo anatomic lung resection were eligible. The Brief Pain Index and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were conducted perioperatively and at four assessments during the first 12 months after the operation. Intent-to-treat analyses using mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally assess the effect of treatment on quality of life components (physical component summary and mental component summary) and pain.
RESULTS: In total, 74 patients underwent thoracotomy, and 132 underwent VATS (including 19 patients who were converted to thoracotomy); 40 and 80 patients, respectively, completed the 12-month surveys. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Physical component summary and Brief Pain Index scores were similar between the two groups throughout the 12 months of follow-up. The mental component summary score, however, was consistently worse in the VATS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported physical component summary and pain scores after VATS and thoracotomy were similar during the first 12 months after surgical resection.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086945      PMCID: PMC4307383          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  21 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer.

Authors:  K Sugi; Y Kaneda; K Esato
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Quality of Life following Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  H M Dowson; A S Cowie; K Ballard; H Gage; T A Rockall
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure.

Authors:  G G Fillenbaum
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Thomas; C Doddoli; S Yena; X Thirion; F Sebag; P Fuentes; R Giudicelli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Lobectomy for early-stage lung carcinoma: a cost analysis of full thoracoscopy versus posterolateral thoracotomy.

Authors:  Ricard Ramos; Cristina Masuet; Dominique Gossot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications.

Authors:  Stephen M Cattaneo; Bernard J Park; Andrew S Wilton; Venkatraman E Seshan; Manjit S Bains; Robert J Downey; Raja M Flores; Nabil Rizk; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  A cost-minimisation analysis of lobectomy: thoracoscopic versus posterolateral thoracotomy.

Authors:  William R Burfeind; Nikhil P Jaik; Nestor Villamizar; Eric M Toloza; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Pulmonary segmentectomy by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy: reduced hospital length of stay with a minimally-invasive approach.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; David H Harpole; Jennifer H Mangum; Eric M Toloza; Thomas A D'Amico; William R Burfeind
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.

Authors:  R J Landreneau; S R Hazelrigg; M J Mack; R D Dowling; D Burke; J Gavlick; M K Perrino; P S Ritter; C M Bowers; J DeFino
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery pathways in thoracic surgery from Italian VATS Group: perioperative analgesia protocols.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Matteo Segat; Stefano Falini; Marzia Umari; Olga Putina; Lucio Cavaliere; Riccardo Ragazzi; Domenico Massullo; Marco Taurchini; Carlo Del Naja; Andrea Droghetti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Response to "VATS vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain".

Authors:  Emine Ozgur Bayman; Kalpaj R Parekh; John Keech; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Video assisted thoracic surgery vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain.

Authors:  Aris Koryllos; Erich Stoelben
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic right upper sleeve lobectomy for fixated interlobar lymph node.

Authors:  Akif Turna; Seyfi Alper Toker
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-07-15

5.  The impact of resection method and patient factors on quality of life among stage IA non-small cell lung cancer surgical patients.

Authors:  Rebecca M Schwartz; Rowena Yip; Raja M Flores; Ingram Olkin; Emanuela Taioli; Claudia Henschke
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Opioid use and abuse following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tamar B Nobel; Prasad S Adusumilli; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

Review 7.  VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Seshiru Nakazawa; Kimihiro Shimizu; Akira Mogi; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  A Prospective Study of Chronic Pain after Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Emine Ozgur Bayman; Kalpaj R Parekh; John Keech; Atakan Selte; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Limited thoracotomy for segmentectomy: a comparison of postoperative pain with thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yue Cong; Hiroshi Sugimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Preoperative Patient Expectations of Postoperative Pain Are Associated with Moderate to Severe Acute Pain After VATS.

Authors:  Emine Ozgur Bayman; Kalpaj R Parekh; John Keech; Nyle Larson; Mark Vander Weg; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.