| Literature DB >> 26441952 |
Shilja Choyam1, Dhanashree Lokesh1, Bettadaiah Bheemakere Kempaiah2, Rajagopal Kammara1.
Abstract
The generation of a zone of inhibition on a solid substrate indicates the bioactivity of antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocin and enterocin. The indicator strain plays a significant role in bacteriocin assays. Other characteristics of bacteriocins, such as their dispersal ability and the different zymogram components, also affect bacteriocin assays. However, universal well diffusion assays for antimicrobials, irrespective of their ability to diffuse (bacteriocin and enterocin), do not exist. The ability of different zymography components to generate non-specific activities have rarely been explored in the literature. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the impact of major factors (diffusion and rate of diffusion) in a solid substrate bioassay, and to document the adverse effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate in zymograms used to estimate the approximate molecular weight of bacteriocins.Entities:
Keywords: Enterococcus; antimicrobial peptides; bacteriocins; bifidobacteria; diffusion; zone of inhibition (ZOI)
Year: 2015 PMID: 26441952 PMCID: PMC4585010 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Strains used in this study.
| Bacterial strain | Reference |
|---|---|
| This study | |
| MTCC | |
| This study | |
| DSM | |
| NEB | |
| MTCC | |
| MTCC | |
| MTCC, type strain | |
| MTCC, | |
| Type strain MTCC, ATCC 17440, DSM50188 | |
| MTCC, | |
| This study | |
| This study | |
| MTCC, NCTC 10353 | |
| This study | |
| This study | |
| This study |
Formation of non-specific ZOI with different sample types in native and SDS-PAGE.
| Native/SDS | Type of sample buffer | Type of running buffer | Type of sample/results | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | |||
| Native Page | Native | Native | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y |
| SDS | SDS | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Native | SDS | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| SDS | Native | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| SDS PAGE | Native | SDS | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| SDS | Native | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Native | Native | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| SDS | SDS | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
Comparative study of bacteriocin, lactocin, and enterocin on different formats such, as well diffusion (WD), unique well diffusion (UWD), and disk diffusion (D).
| S.NO | Bacterial strain | Bacteriocin | Enterocin | Lactocin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WD | UWD | D | WD | UWD | D | WD | UWD | D | ||
| 1 | - | + | - | - | + | P | - | + | P | |
| 2 | - | + | P | - | + | P | - | + | P | |
| 3 | - | + | - | - | + | - | P | + | P | |
| 4 | - | P | P | - | - | - | P | + | P | |
| 5 | - | + | P | - | + | P | - | + | P | |
| 6 | + | + | P | - | + | P | - | P | P | |
| 7 | - | + | P | - | + | P | - | + | P | |