Literature DB >> 26440864

Comparing the fixational and functional preferred retinal location in a pointing task.

Brian Sullivan1, Laura Walker2.   

Abstract

Patients with central vision loss (CVL) typically adopt eccentric viewing strategies using a preferred retinal locus (PRL) in peripheral retina. Clinically, the PRL is defined monocularly as the area of peripheral retina used to fixate small stimuli. It is not clear if this fixational PRL describes the same portion of peripheral retina used during dynamic binocular eye-hand coordination tasks. We studied this question with four participants each with a unique CVL history. Using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope, we measured participants' monocular visual fields and the location and stability of their fixational PRLs. Participants' monocular and binocular visual fields were also evaluated using a computer monitor and eye tracker. Lastly, eye-hand coordination was tested over several trials where participants pointed to and touched a small target on a touchscreen monitor. Trials were blocked and carried out monocularly and binocularly, with a target appearing at 5° or 15° from screen center, in one of 8 locations. During pointing, our participants often exhibited long movement durations, an increased number of eye movements and impaired accuracy, especially in monocular conditions. However, these compensatory changes in behavior did not consistently worsen when loci beyond the fixational PRL were used. While fixational PRL size, location and fixation stability provide a necessary description of behavior, they are not sufficient to capture the pointing PRL used in this task. Generally, patients use a larger portion of peripheral retina than one might expect from measures of the fixational PRL alone, when pointing to a salient target without time constraints. While the fixational and pointing PRLs often overlap, the fixational PRL does not predict the large area of peripheral retina that can be used.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central vision loss; Eye movements; Eye–hand coordination; Preferred retinal location; Scotoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26440864      PMCID: PMC4726983          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

Review 1.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?

Authors:  M F Land; M Hayhoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reading with multiple preferred retinal loci: implications for training a more efficient reading strategy.

Authors:  A Déruaz; A R Whatham; C Mermoud; A B Safran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Evaluation of a new quantitative technique to assess the number and extent of preferred retinal loci in macular disease.

Authors:  M D Crossland; M Sims; R F Galbraith; G S Rubin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss.

Authors:  Luminita Tarita-Nistor; Esther G González; Samuel N Markowitz; Martin J Steinbach
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Characteristics of AMD patients with low vision receiving visual rehabilitation.

Authors:  R A Schuchard; S Naseer; K de Castro
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-10

6.  Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population.

Authors:  D C Fletcher; R A Schuchard
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease.

Authors:  J M White; H E Bedell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Marco A Zarbin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

9.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

10.  Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area.

Authors:  G T Timberlake; M A Mainster; E Peli; R A Augliere; E A Essock; L E Arend
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Sidika Kajtezovic; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Evaluating Reading Performance in Different Preferred Retinal Loci in Persian-Speaking Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Abdollah Farzaneh; Abbas Riazi; Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani; Asgar Doostdar; Mohammad Kamali; Ahad Sedaghat; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Mapping the binocular scotoma in macular degeneration.

Authors:  Cécile Vullings; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Training eye movements for visual search in individuals with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.