Literature DB >> 20003597

Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss.

Luminita Tarita-Nistor1, Esther G González, Samuel N Markowitz, Martin J Steinbach.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss. Most of these patients use preferred retinal loci (PRLs) in the healthy eccentric part of the retina to fixate, but fixation stability and retinal location are not always optimal for best visual performance. This study examined whether fixation stability and a new PRL location can be trained and whether these changes in ocular motor control transfer into better reading performance. Six patients with age-related macular degeneration participated in the study. Fixation stability measurements, microperimetry, and auditory biofeedback training were performed with the MP-1 microperimeter. The auditory biofeedback was used during five 1-h long training sessions to improve fixation and relocate the PRL. Fixation location and stability were recorded while viewing four different targets: a cross, a letter, a word, and a nine-cycle radial grating. Visual acuity was assessed with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and reading performance with the MNRead test. The results showed that all patients developed a new PRL in an optimal location for reading, and they were able to use it consistently while viewing different targets. Fixation stability improved 53% after training. Learning transferred to the old PRL even though fixation stability at this location was not trained. All these improvements in ocular motor control translated into better reading performance: reading speed improved 38% and reading acuity and critical print size gained two lines. We conclude that the ability of the ocular motor system to fixate is flexible in patients with central vision loss: a new PRL can be trained, fixation stability can be improved, and learning transfers to an untrained location. These gains in ocular motor control result in better visual performance. This property can be successfully used to optimize the residual vision of patients with central vision loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20003597     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523809990265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  27 in total

1.  Changes in retinal sensitivity in geographic atrophy progression as measured by microperimetry.

Authors:  Annal D Meleth; Pradeep Mettu; Elvira Agrón; Emily Y Chew; Srinivas R Sadda; Frederick L Ferris; Wai T Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in people with macular disease.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Multimodal analysis of the Preferred Retinal Location and the Transition Zone in patients with Stargardt Disease.

Authors:  Tommaso Verdina; Vivienne C Greenstein; Andrea Sodi; Stephen H Tsang; Tomas R Burke; Ilaria Passerini; Rando Allikmets; Gianni Virgili; Gian Maria Cavallini; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Rapid and persistent adaptability of human oculomotor control in response to simulated central vision loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Selective retinal ganglion cell loss in familial dysautonomia.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendoza-Santiesteban; Thomas R Hedges Iii; Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Felicia Axelrod; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Microperimetry in age: related macular degeneration.

Authors:  E Midena; E Pilotto
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Biofeedback fixation training method for improving eccentric vision in patients with loss of foveal function secondary to different maculopathies.

Authors:  Marco U Morales; Saker Saker; Craig Wilde; Martin Rubinstein; Paolo Limoli; Winfried M Amoaku
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Comparing the fixational and functional preferred retinal location in a pointing task.

Authors:  Brian Sullivan; Laura Walker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.