Literature DB >> 26439531

Microhomology-Mediated End Joining: A Back-up Survival Mechanism or Dedicated Pathway?

Agnel Sfeir1, Lorraine S Symington2.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) disrupt the continuity of chromosomes and their repair by error-free mechanisms is essential to preserve genome integrity. Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is an error-prone repair mechanism that involves alignment of microhomologous sequences internal to the broken ends before joining, and is associated with deletions and insertions that mark the original break site, as well as chromosome translocations. Whether MMEJ has a physiological role or is simply a back-up repair mechanism is a matter of debate. Here we review recent findings pertaining to the mechanism of MMEJ and discuss its role in normal and cancer cells.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA Polθ; MMEJ; chromosomal translocations; end joining; homologous recombination; microhomology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26439531      PMCID: PMC4638128          DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


  97 in total

1.  Biochemical evidence for Ku-independent backup pathways of NHEJ.

Authors:  Huichen Wang; Ange Ronel Perrault; Yoshihiko Takeda; Wei Qin; Hongyan Wang; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Huichen Wang; Bustanur Rosidi; Ronel Perrault; Minli Wang; Lihua Zhang; Frank Windhofer; George Iliakis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Analysis of 5' junctions of human LINE-1 and Alu retrotransposons suggests an alternative model for 5'-end attachment requiring microhomology-mediated end-joining.

Authors:  Nora Zingler; Ute Willhoeft; Hans-Peter Brose; Volker Schoder; Thomas Jahns; Kay-Martin O Hanschmann; Tammy A Morrish; Johannes Löwer; Gerald G Schumann
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex and non-homologous end-joining of incompatible ends in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhang; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-07-25

5.  Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length.

Authors:  James M Daley; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Ku-dependent and Ku-independent end-joining pathways lead to chromosomal rearrangements during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Abram Gabriel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining.

Authors:  Marc Audebert; Bernard Salles; Patrick Calsou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  POLQ (Pol theta), a DNA polymerase and DNA-dependent ATPase in human cells.

Authors:  Mineaki Seki; Federica Marini; Richard D Wood
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways.

Authors:  Minli Wang; Weizhong Wu; Wenqi Wu; Bustanur Rosidi; Lihua Zhang; Huichen Wang; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  206 in total

1.  EXO1 suppresses double-strand break induced homologous recombination between diverged sequences in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Chun-Chin Chen; Elena Avdievich; Yongwei Zhang; Yu Zhang; Kaichun Wei; Kyeryoung Lee; Winfried Edelmann; Maria Jasin; Jeannine R LaRocque
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 2.  The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of Damage Signaling and Outcomes to Stress in DNA Replication and Repair.

Authors:  Aleem Syed; John A Tainer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  Stop pulling my strings - what telomeres taught us about the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Agnel Sfeir
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Targeted DNA insertion in plants.

Authors:  Oliver Xiaoou Dong; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Eric Danner; Sanum Bashir; Saniye Yumlu; Wolfgang Wurst; Benedikt Wefers; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  CtIP/Ctp1/Sae2, molecular form fit for function.

Authors:  Sara N Andres; R Scott Williams
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 7.  The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites.

Authors:  Amir Taheri-Ghahfarokhi; Benjamin J M Taylor; Roberto Nitsch; Anders Lundin; Anna-Lina Cavallo; Katja Madeyski-Bengtson; Fredrik Karlsson; Maryam Clausen; Ryan Hicks; Lorenz M Mayr; Mohammad Bohlooly-Y; Marcello Maresca
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Genomic consequences of aberrant DNA repair mechanisms stratify ovarian cancer histotypes.

Authors:  Yi Kan Wang; Ali Bashashati; Michael S Anglesio; Dawn R Cochrane; Diljot S Grewal; Gavin Ha; Andrew McPherson; Hugo M Horlings; Janine Senz; Leah M Prentice; Anthony N Karnezis; Daniel Lai; Mohamed R Aniba; Allen W Zhang; Karey Shumansky; Celia Siu; Adrian Wan; Melissa K McConechy; Hector Li-Chang; Alicia Tone; Diane Provencher; Manon de Ladurantaye; Hubert Fleury; Aikou Okamoto; Satoshi Yanagida; Nozomu Yanaihara; Misato Saito; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; David G Huntsman; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.