Literature DB >> 26439125

Holding-time and method comparisons for the analysis of fecal-indicator bacteria in groundwater.

Rebecca N Bushon1, Amie M G Brady2, Bruce D Lindsey3.   

Abstract

As part of the US Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program, groundwater samples from domestic- and public-supply wells were collected and analyzed for fecal-indicator bacteria. A holding time comparison for total coliforms, Escherichia coli, and enterococci was done by analyzing samples within 8 h using presence/absence methods and within 18-30 h using quantitative methods. The data indicate that results obtained within 18-30 h were not significantly different from those obtained within 8 h for total coliforms and enterococci, by Colilert® and Enterolert® methods (IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME), respectively. Quantitative laboratory methods for samples analyzed within 18-30 h showed a statistically significant higher detection frequency when compared to presence/absence methods done within 8 h for the following methods, E. coli by Colilert and enterococci by membrane filtration on mEI agar. Additionally, a comparison of methods for the enumeration of enterococci was done. Using non-parametric statistical analyses, results from the two methods were statistically different. In this study, the membrane filtration method on mEI agar was more sensitive, resulted in more detections of enterococci, and results were easier to interpret than with the quantitative Enterolert method. The quantitative Enterolert method produced varying levels of fluorescence, which required additional verification steps to eliminate false-positive results. It may be more advantageous to analyze untreated groundwater for enterococci using the membrane filtration method on mEI agar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal-indicator bacteria; Groundwater; Holding time; Method comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26439125     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4887-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of conventional and alternative monitoring methods for a recreational marine beach with nonpoint source of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Shibata; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Christopher D Sinigalliano; Maribeth L Gidley; Lisa R W Plano; Jay M Fleisher; John D Wang; Samir M Elmir; Guoqing He; Mary E Wright; Amir M Abdelzaher; Cristina Ortega; David Wanless; Anna C Garza; Jonathan Kish; Troy Scott; Julie Hollenbeck; Lorraine C Backer; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Storage of water samples for bacteriologic examinations.

Authors:  J A MCCARTHY
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1957-08

3.  Analytical limits of three beta-glucosidase-based commercial culture methods used in environmental microbiology, to detect enterococci.

Authors:  Andrée F Maheux; François J Picard; Maurice Boissinot; Vicky Huppé; Luc Bissonnette; Jean-Luc T Bernier; Philippe Cantin; Ann Huletsky; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  Evaluation of Enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters.

Authors:  G E Budnick; R T Howard; D R Mayo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of four-hour and twenty-four-hour refrigerated storage of nonpotable water for fecal coliform analysis.

Authors:  J H Standridge; D J Lesar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The effects of nutrients on the survival of Escherichia coli in lake water.

Authors:  C H Lim; K P Flint
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1989-06

7.  Holding effects on coliform enumeration in drinking water samples.

Authors:  A E McDaniels; R H Bordner; P S Gartside; J R Haines; K P Brenner; C C Rankin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Enterococci as indicators of Lake Michigan recreational water quality: comparison of two methodologies and their impacts on public health regulatory events.

Authors:  Julie Kinzelman; Clement Ng; Emma Jackson; Stephen Gradus; Robert Bagley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Assessment of the effects of holding time and temperature on Escherichia coli densities in surface water samples.

Authors:  Misty L Pope; Michelle Bussen; Mary Ann Feige; Lois Shadix; Sharon Gonder; Crystal Rodgers; Yildiz Chambers; Jessica Pulz; Ken Miller; Kevin Connell; Jon Standridge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparison of Enterococcus species diversity in marine water and wastewater using Enterolert and EPA Method 1600.

Authors:  Donna M Ferguson; John F Griffith; Charles D McGee; Stephen B Weisberg; Charles Hagedorn
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-06-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of industrial wastewater on the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of groundwater in Ajao- Estate Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Bernadette U Ukah; Ogbonnaya Igwe; Peter Ameh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.